53 Comments
Nov 6, 2022Liked by Brian Mowrey

A late reply.

re: 18% abnormal ECG's.

The largest category is sinus rhythm with sinus arrhythmia. I expect sinus arrhythmia in healthy paediatric patients- it can be noted clinically either with the stethoscope or by assessment of pulse. The pre and post ECG's would need to be carefully compared for cases where it was noted; perhaps Dr. Hoeg looked at this if she had a complete data set.

re: male predominance.

This was explained as a testosterone effect on TMPRSS2 receptors which are increased with testosterone levels. In the original reviews, the spike protein (from Covid or injection) had an affinity for these receptors and caused the cellular damage. The interesting factoid was that menopausal women were also getting an increase of cardiac issues, but were dismissed as "normal" age-related disease. One needed large datasets to really show this, and the mechanism is the same, increased testosterone function as the oestrogen levels decrease. Most healthy males can probably recall the effects of the testosterone surge in the peripubertal years.

Expand full comment
Sep 20, 2022Liked by Brian Mowrey

Another point in favour of the "tip of the iceberg" theory: https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/abs/10.1161/circ.144.suppl_1.10712 from last year.

Expand full comment

VAXX BIO WEAPON - thats it and thats all.

Expand full comment

I wrote to the main author (Mansanguan) and asked for the raw data and, remarkably, I now have it. I'd love your take on it, are you interested and how can I get it to you?

Expand full comment

Thank you, was a very interesting summary on the new Thai study. Subscribed!

Expand full comment

You’re the first person I’ve heard besides myself talking about how myocarditis is proximally caused by exploding heart cells, which results in permanent heart damage. Nice work!

My thoughts are in Armor of Lies II: Abomination (time index 18:35-21:20)

https://rumble.com/v1dyk9p-armor-of-lies-part-2-an-abomination-of-medicine.html

Expand full comment
Aug 17, 2022Liked by Brian Mowrey

My young teen is unvaxxed. He had CoVid. About 2 weeks after he was swimming laps and had an episode of chest pain. I took him to the ER and his HST was 14. This seemed to be right on the bubble for the staff and they were not sure if there was an issue or not. They did every single bedside cardiology test on him and sent all his data up to the cardiology fellow. We were sent home with a Dx of chest pain and I was told if it happened again to bring him back right away. We got him an Apple Watch to track things and he did have a slightly elevated HR in the few weeks that followed but all seems normal now (except his HRV ... which is quite low for a healthy active kid his age). He was not overly sick with his bout of CoVid. He had 2 days of 99 fever which he just played normally and one day of quite a high fever where he rested and drank lots of fluids and took his supplements etc. He seemed a little tired after but not overly so considering how active he is with riding bikes and roller blading and swimming. I know the vax damage is WAY worse and way more common. But the virus itself seems to be able to hurt heart muscles as well, even in unvaxxed and healthy kids who didn’t even need medical care during their illness (no breathing issues or lung involvement at all Omicron wave).

Expand full comment
Aug 17, 2022Liked by Brian Mowrey

I've read through this a few times Brian. I cannot imagine what the parents of these boys are feeling. It's horrific and that's an understatement. I have a 13 year old nephew who's been shot up and boosted. He's a young athlete. I have to figure out how to tell my brother about this. Thank you for reporting on it. I've learned I can trust your stack for fair analysis and that's pretty unusual.

Expand full comment

Re the 13 pc/ml cut-off see: https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.893826

That seems to relate to diagnosis of acute coronary syndrome though in which because of the mechanism (blockage of an artery) you'd get a heterogenous response - either a large amount of heart muscle damage or not.

I think it must be different with myoacrditis where we are concerned with identifying any myocardial damage at all, not screening for MI as a differential diagnosis.

Expand full comment
Aug 17, 2022·edited Aug 17, 2022Liked by Brian Mowrey

Amazing work, thank you.

Here is a great video from British doctor, John Campbell, that does a wonderful job of explaining the above for a simple layman like myself :)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ekTR0w2M9-U

EDIT: Note how the good doctor is aghast at how this is the only study of its kind in the world.

Expand full comment
Aug 17, 2022Liked by Brian Mowrey

They knew about the risk of myocarditis in young males before they issued the EUA for 12-17 and before they finished clinical trials 5-11 or started them for 6 month-4 yrs.

Yet FDA did not require them to test trial participants for Troponin levels (trial sizes were very small). It may have been too late for 12-17 primary series trial but not the booster trial.

Why is this? Because they no doubt knew what the results would be. Justice will not be served unless these people are prosecuted

Expand full comment
Aug 17, 2022Liked by Brian Mowrey

Billions of shots given, but they could only produce one reasonably good study on myocarditis now- 1.75 years later.... and worse, myocarditis was pretty obviously a concern very early on. This study could also be improved if they did not only before and after the first dose, but also 14 and 28 days post 2nd dose.

Expand full comment

1 in 30 or 1 in 3. It doesn't really matter - this vaccine is not safe. It is truly confronting how the USA is no longer capable of basic science.

Expand full comment