Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Tardigrade's avatar

'anti- “The Official Anti-Covid-vaccine Narrative” dissent in an anti-Covid-vaccine journal'

I think of you as our devil's advocate. Keeping us honest. From a dictionary: 'One who debates from a view which he or she may not actually hold, usually to determine its validity or simply for the sake of argument.' It's a valuable role.

It's kind of discouraging that so many on Team Skeptic expect everybody to hew to an identical narrative. That's one of the things we criticize about Team Mainstream Narrative, after all.

Expand full comment
Tardigrade's avatar

Not being a paid subscriber, I can't comment on Berenson's article, so I will inflict my sarcasm on you. He quotes some paper or other: 'Researchers [said?] that mice which produced both anti-N and anti-S antibodies had “better viral control [than those that had anti-S antibodies alone], including against the Omicron variant.”'

Well, duh!

At the risk of sounding stupid, am I the only one who thinks this is so patently obvious that it doesn't need saying? It's the reason why I initially became an mRNA vax skeptic, because natural immunity gives you *both* (and other good stuff besides), and PTB were claiming the spike-based vaccines had better protection.

Expand full comment
59 more comments...

No posts