Some more examples and discussion of the Tolerance Kills theory.
"...using host cells to produce a foreign antigen, absent associated molecular markers of viral infection, intrinsically risks tolerance: The immune system must associate spike protein with “self.”"
I get this is very important, the way I'm reading it is throwing me. The spike protein is the antigen? The way I'm reading this it would appear to imply that the foreign antigen produced by the host is "other", but I doubt this, so it could also mean it's just kind of null because it isn't prompted to be identified without infection markers. But then how does the immune system train on it? If that's too basic, I might be able to backwards engineer it from all this crap I barely understand. Just thought I'd ask while I'm commenting. A few birds eye reflections:
In any case, it can probably be stated that this technology does not properly value the phenomenological/existential positions of self and other and this violation of basic existential fact is making itself apparent in the most visible way one could imagine. There's a kind of poetry in that.
Also it's like this is applying cyber/information warfare principles to... well it wasn't a war to begin with, but what becomes a resource war. Especially if tolerance does increase viral load, infection and transmission. And it seems like by reducing disease it actually increases damage. And that seems like it prompts us to ask what disease is. Disease can be what the body does to minimize damage right?
The cytokine storm stuff has the taste of this too clever cyber-y thinking and it seems like I've you seen you point out it is one way of putting the pieces together.
I find this very optimistic; it feels like a fundamental limit to a potential avenue of exploitation.
Reading the title I thought this was going to be about transsex operations.
very interesting take. This is going to complicate things even more if true, question is what the effect if true of this is.
I wish I understood this better.
One question, does Dose 2 refer to a first booster, or the second shot in the initial vaccination?
"First, using host cells to produce a foreign antigen, absent associated molecular markers of viral infection, intrinsically risks tolerance: The immune system must associate spike protein with “self.” "
While I appreciate your crediting my tolerance hypothesis, I remain befuddled as to why among nearly eight billion humans very few people noticed this particular problem with genetic vaccination, particularly when repeated multiple times per year.
😅 Loved this line - "In the wake of the Incredible New News About Tolerance based on the New News About..."
Sorry if I am not getting everything from this as it was so in depth - when I read the anecdotal reports like those you included in this article it sounds like covid is the cause of their death (which doesn't sound good, because everyone - vaxxed and unvaxxed - get covid.
But I think you are saying that they actually had a covid infection that never cleared, specifically because they were vaxxed. So therefore death is ultimately caused by the vaxx. Is that correct?
You are a God amongst man.
Spammed it on Twitter
"Irrgang, et al. makes it clear that even two doses is total antigen overkill"
That poor person. If he ever puts out a not very conclusive paper, his name screams for jokes, as it translates to "blind alley" or "going astray".
Brian, wonder if you have any thoughts on this:
"Our results provide preliminary evidence that SARS-CoV-2 was already circulating in Northern Italy by late 2019, with the first molecular evidence of infection dating to September 12th, 2019, and no PCR-positive result for any of the 191 samples collected before this date."
All the reports are bio-mechanistically well-described and plausible. A good bio-weapon (or the deployment of "effective" toxic drugs to fight the bio-weapon) that can increase symptom burden and reduce immune system function. AIDS is an example of how you can turn (or sell) a relatively harmless virus into a simmering endemic, international stew of diseases. The virus and the jabs are there to perpetuate a "state-of-emergency", to provide continued cover to perpetuated the bio-security state.
Fortunately, for Long-COVID, there are many immune system boosters that can alleviate symptoms and help repair neurological function. N-Acetyl cysteine and low-pressure hyperbaric oxygen have shown an ability to allow the immune system to do some serious clean up, without the high cytotoxic side effects and with the side benefit of reversing neurological disturbances.
"boosters _out_ to be far more destructive" you probably mean "ought" here.
" ... antibodies elicited _in_ by the first injection appear to ..."
Are you moving in the direction of "if they only reduced the number of mRNAs they are transfecting things might be OK?
"... the Covid-vaccinated do not experience the normal bouts of acute post-infection hypoxia and embolism associated with “Covid-19.”"
I have not been vaccinated nor have I been boosted, but I have not experienced any of those symptoms despite being out and about (sans mask) every day for the last three years. I got a virus in January of 2022 that sounds like SARS-CoV-2. I suppressed it within 24 hours but had a persistent dry cough for two weeks after that, sometimes bringing up some clear phlegm. Maybe I am just lucky and managed to avoid Covid-19 despite living in NorCal where we seemingly have high positive test rates. Maybe those symptoms only occur if you cannot fight off the initial infection. I take 6,000 IUs of D3 most days and 2,000 mg of Ascorbic Acid most days along with some Zinc but the CDC tells us there is no evidence that those help.
I guess we cannot be certain at this stage because much of the basic science seems to remain to be done and I am sure big-Pharma will fight to muddy the waters as long as they can.
I was trying to recall the GC study since someone else brought it up and from my memory I believed it indicated the presence of mRNA and not necessarily the spike, and it was another study that suggested a longer existence of the spike so I was trying to remember the studies.
I'm personally hesitant to look at case studies that haven't been examined because it's always so hard to tell what other variables need to be looked at, but it's also a shame that this tends to be the only way to assess some of this information.
What's frustrating is that several of these cases may be used as indications that COVID is super deadly without looking at it from the context of the vaccines.
I personally would like some more information, but it'd be interesting to see studies that have looked closer into some of these cases.
Squatchin Randy didn't get "long covid" after he got covid. He got it after getting vaccinated and boosted and THEN getting Omicron. Which is exactly what those studies show - that getting vaccinated, boosted, and then a breakthrough infection converts everything to IgG4. And he's so brainwashed he won't even connect it to the vaccines - and neither will his doctors, the so-called "experts" on Long Covid...so much so that he won't try ivermectin, an incredibly safe drug! Sooo infuriating to read! I feel bad for the guy but damn...brainwashed!
The colitis is the cholinergic blocking effect of the S1 subunit. I figured it out at one month of symptoms and 30 pounds sudden weight loss.