A response to a 10+1 -part prompt from Sage Hana. Are viruses real? Did a novel coronavirus emerge in late 2019 spawning a global pandemic? You have deemed Original Antigenic Sin as fake or inaccurate. Who is/are the dominant proponents of this theory and where have they gone astray?
Oct 15, 2022·edited Oct 15, 2022Liked by Brian Mowrey
To 8. "why they push this":
One reason seams to be that they are in preparation of granting any "mRNA" platform product, of which there are many in the pipeline, auto-approval, "cuz tech framework is 'established'" (and it doesn't matter what you encode, like, a killer protein or some harmless thing, it's the same, right ?!), and politicians seem retarded/corrupt enough to wave it through, like so many other things.
This must be a "remember 1986 child vax act? If we got away with that, what won't we get away with? Well... let's try!" thing...
And that... was already alluded to in this 2019 clip, right before C19 was officially announced as a thing:
Pay close attention to the wording, the overall frame, and the part between the lines.
It seems like "they" planned to basically abolish proper medical testing of pharma products.
Well. For pharma companies who can affort to license this tech, and have enough high tech gear to do it. I imagine only the big corporations will be able to.
Making everyone who does things the old way not economically viable - because they will still have to do all this pesky testing, as "not 'established' magic mRNA platform". Whereas the others don't need to spend the money on years long testing.
That's also a way to crush the competition and leave only a few huge players on the field, I guess.
And unleashing untested crap on the populace as the new normal for the foreseeable future will decimate it some more also. They manage to still sweep the extent of the spikejuice harms under the rug and gaslight the populace, and I don't see why they won't continue that way. It's aleady beyond unbelievable.
I think another answer to number eight is the deployment of future mRNA vaccines basef on the theory of it. If something ails you, an mRNA vaccine can be developed quickly based on genetic information to fix you. It theoretically could be a great repetitive profit source, similar to drugs that pharma changes a tiny bit and re-releases. Except this mRNA vaccine is likely to kill all the people willing to engage in this profiteering exercise.
'I have theorized that the OAS was an attractive explanation for the failure to develop a universal flu vaccine. The attraction was that there was some “flaw” in the immune system to blame vaccine failure for, instead of saying the flaw is duh, vaccines can’t stave off a respiratory infection forever. If you say that you don’t get money to keep trying to improve the product.'
With tongue only partly in cheek, I find this to be the most compelling argument of all.
Oct 14, 2022·edited Oct 14, 2022Liked by Brian Mowrey
You nailed it! Chimichangas are very disappointing.
Oh and your answer to #8! The gang of medicine men/policy thugs is populated by people who don't realize failure is possible! Yeah, I think I vote for that.
My explanation for most things is that ‘the default setting of humans is to do the wrong thing’ - from observations of history!
On a different note, can Brian do a video with slides to show why he thinks OAS is not real. I thought the problem with Dengue was an example ( infection with one strain earlier in life can make infection with a different strain much worse later on). I did read his article at the time but sometimes difficult concepts are better explained in person with a few diagrams!
Good attempts, but one seems as confused as the other. That's probably a good thing as it shows a decent level of honesty and of openness, which has sadly been missing. I like to think I'm quite hardy, and stoic, but I've had flu a couple of times at either end of my years (I'm 71) and both times it was absolutely shocking. I repeat, shocking. I also (...seemingly) had PCR covid, but with no serious respiratory issues in Nov/Dec 2021, and it was a very odd (unique?) kinda illness, but very, very diff to flu, or any other virus I may have had (I also had a shocker of an upper and lower respiratory bug in Dec/Jan 2017/18 that really floored me). Anyway, I think the whole SAR's imbroglio has been totally confused/mangled by assorted, and specious, rank opportunism, and even more so with weasel-like quisling fact-checkers all the way down.
Here are my answers. I am a psychiatrist and used to be a proponent of evidence based medicine before I realised that all evidence can be faked, except perhaps for what happens in front of one’s own eyes:
1. Yes viruses are real.
2. Yes a Frankenstein Coronavirus emerged in late 2019 and it was manufactured in a lab.
3. I don’t know since OAS is too far out of my area of expertise.
4. Any going astray was sinister in intent and thus part of the experiment.
5. A vaccine was not necessary because the fatality rates were always based on lies, from the collapsing people in Wuhan to the refrigerated trucks in NYC.
6. I am Portuguese and I like pasteis de Belem.
7. Yes herd cull, it can’t be denied when looking at worldwide excess mortality figures.
8. They are all WEF puppets, all the cabinets are penetrated.
9. I used to trust, then I believed that Covid had exposed the corruption in the MIIC/ Pharma and now I understand that science and medicine is built on a stinking heap of idolatrous dung.
10. In medicine, there is always pressure to skew results and diagnoses and treatments according to the prevailing winds.
Bonus takeaway: fortify with Vitamin D, C and zinc and prayer because great evil is afoot and so many cannot or will not see it. There is a great, dark conspiracy of satanists and they are squirming with glee at the fear, death and injury they have unleashed. Name it and banish it.
Puh-leeze. Chimichangas. First, anything fried is better than anything not fried. Second, well we don’t need a second do we? That answer discredits everything else you’ve written. I can’t take you seriously about anything. Was this all just farce?
Oct 14, 2022·edited Oct 14, 2022Liked by Brian Mowrey
Very good succinct answers and an excellent recap. Without really disagreeing, I wanted to add a couple of my pedantic, repetitive insights.
I hate the “are viruses real?” question because I think it’s a misapprehension of some of the critiques of what is conventionally thought of as viral theory. As you said, part of the term is simply a convention for invisible things that make you sick. As to the particular microbes that we view under magnification, there’s always been a bit of a chicken or the egg going on, meaning are they a cause of disease or effect? If they’re the latter, then the cause of disease is still unknown (or even smaller!) Regardless, this debate is somewhat missing the actual philosophical quandary, which is trying to fight disease or taking a more holistic approach in maximizing your overall health (“terrain theory”). The former seems to be much more lucrative and more amenable to our culture… most would rather take a shot or pill than exercise and eat well. However, that said, I don’t think that this has to be an either/or situation and there’s merit to treatment as much as prevention. I mean, what’s done is done sometimes, and I’m not sure we’d be living in a better world where if you got sick, your doctor was just like “well, I told you so!”
It’s also interesting that vaccines themselves sort of fall into both categories of prevention and attack. They’re like the “preemptive strike to maintain the peace” of medical science and probably deserve as much scrutiny as similar military actions would.
My second point is my common refrain regarding conspiracies and more specifically the always nebulous “they”. Are “they” trying to depopulate? I’m sure some are. Thinning the herd has always been popular in elite circles, just look back to England in the 15th/16th century and you’ll find that part of the push for colonizing the “New World” was to get rid of some of the riff-raff. I have no doubt this sentiment still exists amongst the rich and powerful and is a driving force behind some of the pandemic measures, climate change, and what have you. But this is where we need to be hyper specific because when I look at companies like Pfizer, I struggle to find the profit motive in killing their potential customers (or even limiting future customers by sterilization l). I believe for the most part, they’ve taken the actions they have simply because they’re profitable and they could. That probably even applies to the selection of the mRNA platform itself. It was quick, relatively easy, and possible and the only safety goal was to make sure any damage wasn’t abundantly apparent. And to my eye, they’ve succeeded at that… thus far, anyway. You can sell a cigarette for personal consumption but not anthrax. And you’d be a pretty bad business if you wanted to.
Beyond that, it gets really complicated. Even taking an entity like the WEF… how sure can anyone be that their members are some sort of hivemind? Or even an individual like Bill Gates, is he an evil mastermind or a misguided true believer with lots of people in his ear?
So in the end, it is a depopulation agenda and it isn’t. Most events of this scale can be parsed down to a singular cause or motivation. And as such, they can’t be solved by pulling back a curtain to reveal the Wizard behind the controls.
Hey Brian, it’s great that you took the time to respond to Sage. Much appreciated!
Looking at all of this zoomed out, it seems to me that OAS as a label kind of got thrown around a bit loosely. By your research, the historical background does seem pretty dodgy and sketchy. It seems like OAS — which you’ve shown in its science-history context — got conflated with “antigenic priming” and “immunologic priming”.
So just to clarify: Do you think there’s evidence of some kind of priming going on? What would you call it?
I think these questions people have are fairly common now: Why are all the jabbed people around me getting sick with the same thing over and over? Why are my unjabbed friends and family seemingly unaffected?
I look at what’s happening and ask:
Doesn’t this indicate we are observing a phenomena that seems to point to a degree of some sort of immunological imprinting? Why wouldn’t repeated injections, with ongoing (endless?) internal production of the antigen spike, and corresponding antibody production and immune system training (targeting the spike, not the *whole virus*)—why wouldn’t this lead to a kind of imprinting, whatever we call it?
"Did US Scientists Just Create ... FrankenVariant... with Projected *80% Mortality*?"
https://ashmedai.substack.com/p/did-us-scientists-just-create-an
To 8. "why they push this":
One reason seams to be that they are in preparation of granting any "mRNA" platform product, of which there are many in the pipeline, auto-approval, "cuz tech framework is 'established'" (and it doesn't matter what you encode, like, a killer protein or some harmless thing, it's the same, right ?!), and politicians seem retarded/corrupt enough to wave it through, like so many other things.
This must be a "remember 1986 child vax act? If we got away with that, what won't we get away with? Well... let's try!" thing...
And that... was already alluded to in this 2019 clip, right before C19 was officially announced as a thing:
https://odysee.com/@fauci:f/Universal-Flu-Vaccine.-C-SPAN,-October-29,-2019:3
Pay close attention to the wording, the overall frame, and the part between the lines.
It seems like "they" planned to basically abolish proper medical testing of pharma products.
Well. For pharma companies who can affort to license this tech, and have enough high tech gear to do it. I imagine only the big corporations will be able to.
Making everyone who does things the old way not economically viable - because they will still have to do all this pesky testing, as "not 'established' magic mRNA platform". Whereas the others don't need to spend the money on years long testing.
That's also a way to crush the competition and leave only a few huge players on the field, I guess.
And unleashing untested crap on the populace as the new normal for the foreseeable future will decimate it some more also. They manage to still sweep the extent of the spikejuice harms under the rug and gaslight the populace, and I don't see why they won't continue that way. It's aleady beyond unbelievable.
Go Brian! 🍻
I think another answer to number eight is the deployment of future mRNA vaccines basef on the theory of it. If something ails you, an mRNA vaccine can be developed quickly based on genetic information to fix you. It theoretically could be a great repetitive profit source, similar to drugs that pharma changes a tiny bit and re-releases. Except this mRNA vaccine is likely to kill all the people willing to engage in this profiteering exercise.
You always come up with some gems in your writing Brian. This one is so simple.. it was always right under our noses;
"And that last point is especially why any non-virus theories for what we call “Covid-19” don’t pan out. Then why aren’t the kids affected?"
Exactly.. if it was always just a matter of 5G activated chemtrail particles enhanced by poor nutrition, why not the kids too? Duh.
A great piece, thank you.
'I have theorized that the OAS was an attractive explanation for the failure to develop a universal flu vaccine. The attraction was that there was some “flaw” in the immune system to blame vaccine failure for, instead of saying the flaw is duh, vaccines can’t stave off a respiratory infection forever. If you say that you don’t get money to keep trying to improve the product.'
With tongue only partly in cheek, I find this to be the most compelling argument of all.
Thank you for this well written, easy to understand, piece. Clarifies many fuzzy areas for me.
You nailed it! Chimichangas are very disappointing.
Oh and your answer to #8! The gang of medicine men/policy thugs is populated by people who don't realize failure is possible! Yeah, I think I vote for that.
My explanation for most things is that ‘the default setting of humans is to do the wrong thing’ - from observations of history!
On a different note, can Brian do a video with slides to show why he thinks OAS is not real. I thought the problem with Dengue was an example ( infection with one strain earlier in life can make infection with a different strain much worse later on). I did read his article at the time but sometimes difficult concepts are better explained in person with a few diagrams!
Good attempts, but one seems as confused as the other. That's probably a good thing as it shows a decent level of honesty and of openness, which has sadly been missing. I like to think I'm quite hardy, and stoic, but I've had flu a couple of times at either end of my years (I'm 71) and both times it was absolutely shocking. I repeat, shocking. I also (...seemingly) had PCR covid, but with no serious respiratory issues in Nov/Dec 2021, and it was a very odd (unique?) kinda illness, but very, very diff to flu, or any other virus I may have had (I also had a shocker of an upper and lower respiratory bug in Dec/Jan 2017/18 that really floored me). Anyway, I think the whole SAR's imbroglio has been totally confused/mangled by assorted, and specious, rank opportunism, and even more so with weasel-like quisling fact-checkers all the way down.
Here are my answers. I am a psychiatrist and used to be a proponent of evidence based medicine before I realised that all evidence can be faked, except perhaps for what happens in front of one’s own eyes:
1. Yes viruses are real.
2. Yes a Frankenstein Coronavirus emerged in late 2019 and it was manufactured in a lab.
3. I don’t know since OAS is too far out of my area of expertise.
4. Any going astray was sinister in intent and thus part of the experiment.
5. A vaccine was not necessary because the fatality rates were always based on lies, from the collapsing people in Wuhan to the refrigerated trucks in NYC.
6. I am Portuguese and I like pasteis de Belem.
7. Yes herd cull, it can’t be denied when looking at worldwide excess mortality figures.
8. They are all WEF puppets, all the cabinets are penetrated.
9. I used to trust, then I believed that Covid had exposed the corruption in the MIIC/ Pharma and now I understand that science and medicine is built on a stinking heap of idolatrous dung.
10. In medicine, there is always pressure to skew results and diagnoses and treatments according to the prevailing winds.
Bonus takeaway: fortify with Vitamin D, C and zinc and prayer because great evil is afoot and so many cannot or will not see it. There is a great, dark conspiracy of satanists and they are squirming with glee at the fear, death and injury they have unleashed. Name it and banish it.
Puh-leeze. Chimichangas. First, anything fried is better than anything not fried. Second, well we don’t need a second do we? That answer discredits everything else you’ve written. I can’t take you seriously about anything. Was this all just farce?
Very good succinct answers and an excellent recap. Without really disagreeing, I wanted to add a couple of my pedantic, repetitive insights.
I hate the “are viruses real?” question because I think it’s a misapprehension of some of the critiques of what is conventionally thought of as viral theory. As you said, part of the term is simply a convention for invisible things that make you sick. As to the particular microbes that we view under magnification, there’s always been a bit of a chicken or the egg going on, meaning are they a cause of disease or effect? If they’re the latter, then the cause of disease is still unknown (or even smaller!) Regardless, this debate is somewhat missing the actual philosophical quandary, which is trying to fight disease or taking a more holistic approach in maximizing your overall health (“terrain theory”). The former seems to be much more lucrative and more amenable to our culture… most would rather take a shot or pill than exercise and eat well. However, that said, I don’t think that this has to be an either/or situation and there’s merit to treatment as much as prevention. I mean, what’s done is done sometimes, and I’m not sure we’d be living in a better world where if you got sick, your doctor was just like “well, I told you so!”
It’s also interesting that vaccines themselves sort of fall into both categories of prevention and attack. They’re like the “preemptive strike to maintain the peace” of medical science and probably deserve as much scrutiny as similar military actions would.
My second point is my common refrain regarding conspiracies and more specifically the always nebulous “they”. Are “they” trying to depopulate? I’m sure some are. Thinning the herd has always been popular in elite circles, just look back to England in the 15th/16th century and you’ll find that part of the push for colonizing the “New World” was to get rid of some of the riff-raff. I have no doubt this sentiment still exists amongst the rich and powerful and is a driving force behind some of the pandemic measures, climate change, and what have you. But this is where we need to be hyper specific because when I look at companies like Pfizer, I struggle to find the profit motive in killing their potential customers (or even limiting future customers by sterilization l). I believe for the most part, they’ve taken the actions they have simply because they’re profitable and they could. That probably even applies to the selection of the mRNA platform itself. It was quick, relatively easy, and possible and the only safety goal was to make sure any damage wasn’t abundantly apparent. And to my eye, they’ve succeeded at that… thus far, anyway. You can sell a cigarette for personal consumption but not anthrax. And you’d be a pretty bad business if you wanted to.
Beyond that, it gets really complicated. Even taking an entity like the WEF… how sure can anyone be that their members are some sort of hivemind? Or even an individual like Bill Gates, is he an evil mastermind or a misguided true believer with lots of people in his ear?
So in the end, it is a depopulation agenda and it isn’t. Most events of this scale can be parsed down to a singular cause or motivation. And as such, they can’t be solved by pulling back a curtain to reveal the Wizard behind the controls.
all this talk about viruses ...
Hey Brian, it’s great that you took the time to respond to Sage. Much appreciated!
Looking at all of this zoomed out, it seems to me that OAS as a label kind of got thrown around a bit loosely. By your research, the historical background does seem pretty dodgy and sketchy. It seems like OAS — which you’ve shown in its science-history context — got conflated with “antigenic priming” and “immunologic priming”.
So just to clarify: Do you think there’s evidence of some kind of priming going on? What would you call it?
I think these questions people have are fairly common now: Why are all the jabbed people around me getting sick with the same thing over and over? Why are my unjabbed friends and family seemingly unaffected?
I look at what’s happening and ask:
Doesn’t this indicate we are observing a phenomena that seems to point to a degree of some sort of immunological imprinting? Why wouldn’t repeated injections, with ongoing (endless?) internal production of the antigen spike, and corresponding antibody production and immune system training (targeting the spike, not the *whole virus*)—why wouldn’t this lead to a kind of imprinting, whatever we call it?
What’s your take on it?
Thanks in advance!
Excellent article~thank you!