Very interesting post Brian. I do wonder if the search for answers may make accrue a hint of a spike hypochondriac mentality and assume that the spike is the most nefarious thing known to man. It could very well be, but sometimes this search may pollute other endeavors by lumping everything into an "all-spike" narrative.
It can sometimes feel like the search for prions is one area where every little prion-like study means that many people may suffer from dementia. I haven't looked too deeply into the prions issue but I think having a back and forth discussion should help find the nuance in-between.
And speaking of not using the tools properly, I wonder what you thought of the BLAST study trying to link the spike insertion to the MSH3 protein.
I tried rebuking the paper but I think my post didn't cover some of my concerns in-depth:
I brought this up because I find no association between the insertion and the MSH3 protein aside from "this insertion was in here, this whole 19 nucleotide section which we really didn't account for since we were only looking at the 12 nucleotide insertion also appears in this protein. This protein helps repair DNA mismatches. Therefore, this insertion of only a few amino acids means that the spike is causing cancer!" It's been cited a ton and even appeared in some interviews/conferences and I can't figure out why.
Very interesting post Brian. I do wonder if the search for answers may make accrue a hint of a spike hypochondriac mentality and assume that the spike is the most nefarious thing known to man. It could very well be, but sometimes this search may pollute other endeavors by lumping everything into an "all-spike" narrative.
It can sometimes feel like the search for prions is one area where every little prion-like study means that many people may suffer from dementia. I haven't looked too deeply into the prions issue but I think having a back and forth discussion should help find the nuance in-between.
And speaking of not using the tools properly, I wonder what you thought of the BLAST study trying to link the spike insertion to the MSH3 protein.
I tried rebuking the paper but I think my post didn't cover some of my concerns in-depth:
https://moderndiscontent.substack.com/p/rebuking-the-moderna-patent-paper
I brought this up because I find no association between the insertion and the MSH3 protein aside from "this insertion was in here, this whole 19 nucleotide section which we really didn't account for since we were only looking at the 12 nucleotide insertion also appears in this protein. This protein helps repair DNA mismatches. Therefore, this insertion of only a few amino acids means that the spike is causing cancer!" It's been cited a ton and even appeared in some interviews/conferences and I can't figure out why.
"Guasine-Rich RNA" does not exist, it is called guanine-rich RNA...
Thanks for this contribution to the discussion. 👍🏽
Thank you, Brian. I always look forward to your posts.
Have you shared this with Jessica Rose?