ANOTHER study purports to support Covid vaccination during pregnancy while hiding half the data! No, really! Another one - I know! It just keeps happening!
Hi Brian my apologies but can you give a top level summary of your findings? Based on the points you review, I am guessing it would be something like: "Covid vaccination during pregnancy does not improve any birth outcomes and may in fact be harmful."
No "evidence' or proof is necessary that there are studies and then there are "studies". A regular reminder that the vacc pimps also had their "studies".
Not that any of us can do anything about it, but there needs to be a movement to "open review" instead of "peer review". All data associated with any study and all reviews must be published. There really isn't any valid excuse not to operate this way.
Just imagine if this study had to publish all their data (deidentified, but not preprocessed or curated beyond that) and this review were published as associated commentary underneath (with some kind of upvoting/downvoting and registration system to help keep things relevant)
Thanks for taking the time to pick this apart. It is deeply frustrating that someone, somewhere, apparently has access to maternity outcome data from the second half of 2021, but these numbers don't seem to have been made public, anywhere. I want to see that data! Particularly for August thru December!
Hi Brian my apologies but can you give a top level summary of your findings? Based on the points you review, I am guessing it would be something like: "Covid vaccination during pregnancy does not improve any birth outcomes and may in fact be harmful."
No "evidence' or proof is necessary that there are studies and then there are "studies". A regular reminder that the vacc pimps also had their "studies".
That handwriting almost qualifies you as a GP. Almost.
Not that any of us can do anything about it, but there needs to be a movement to "open review" instead of "peer review". All data associated with any study and all reviews must be published. There really isn't any valid excuse not to operate this way.
Just imagine if this study had to publish all their data (deidentified, but not preprocessed or curated beyond that) and this review were published as associated commentary underneath (with some kind of upvoting/downvoting and registration system to help keep things relevant)
Thanks for taking the time to pick this apart. It is deeply frustrating that someone, somewhere, apparently has access to maternity outcome data from the second half of 2021, but these numbers don't seem to have been made public, anywhere. I want to see that data! Particularly for August thru December!
Thanks for this. Nature morning newsletter was pimping this crap yesterday.
The future of Scotland, killed by a clotting neurotoxin. I blame the TNI primarily. News would be reaching more people if the TNI could be broken.