Share this comment
I said layman's terms! LOL.
Just one point I wanted to make.... I don't think my simplification was implying that negative efficacy = OAS. Rather, it's breaking efficacy down into the individual components of infection, illness and death and then assigning them to possible differentiating signals . Or maybe what you're saying is that …
I said layman's terms! LOL.
Just one point I wanted to make.... I don't think my simplification was implying that negative efficacy = OAS. Rather, it's breaking efficacy down into the individual components of infection, illness and death and then assigning them to possible differentiating signals . Or maybe what you're saying is that no matter which of those components you select, it doesn't or can't be a signal of OAS. It's probably that. Thanks for the response.