Good morning Brian, There's a great article over at American Thinker that dovetails with you earlier assessment of the CDC's Kentucky study on Natural Immunity vs vaxed. It's titled "The CDC's Bogus Kentucky COVID Research" by Ron Pillman. (Pillman - pseudonym?).
Also, look at figure S7 patient R9 - All spike/no nucleocapsoid after 47 days (54 less 7 initial). My theory is this patient is at risk for reinfection from a variant???
c. Recovered donor (R9), that have timepoint 1 sampled 7 days after the second dose of the vaccine
735 and timepoint 2 sampled 54 days after second dose of the vaccine
Hello again. I saw the post from Alex just a little while ago and read both you and publius' post regarding that study on vaxing the folks with previous natural immunity. The particular chart he highlighted looks like it shows that with NI you have both Nucleocapsid and Spike antibodies and after inoculation, you have trended to a mostly spike based capability. What I wanted to see if you could shed some light on what this means and if you've been jabbed are you more at risk to being in the camp with all the vax only folks with just spike antibodies and no or reduced sterilizing N antibodies? The chart shows a downward trend of N and upward of S assuming if we went out farther in time, it might continue to change? I'm sure the answer is we don't know yet. What's disturbing is if it turns out that we are trending to spike only antibodies, it looks like the NI folks are going to be in the same boat as the only vaxed group? Meaning we now have a bigger problem with this group now suceptible to mutated variants as well as potentially being factories creating more variants? I hope I'm wrong???
Good morning Brian, There's a great article over at American Thinker that dovetails with you earlier assessment of the CDC's Kentucky study on Natural Immunity vs vaxed. It's titled "The CDC's Bogus Kentucky COVID Research" by Ron Pillman. (Pillman - pseudonym?).
Also, look at figure S7 patient R9 - All spike/no nucleocapsoid after 47 days (54 less 7 initial). My theory is this patient is at risk for reinfection from a variant???
c. Recovered donor (R9), that have timepoint 1 sampled 7 days after the second dose of the vaccine
735 and timepoint 2 sampled 54 days after second dose of the vaccine
Hello again. I saw the post from Alex just a little while ago and read both you and publius' post regarding that study on vaxing the folks with previous natural immunity. The particular chart he highlighted looks like it shows that with NI you have both Nucleocapsid and Spike antibodies and after inoculation, you have trended to a mostly spike based capability. What I wanted to see if you could shed some light on what this means and if you've been jabbed are you more at risk to being in the camp with all the vax only folks with just spike antibodies and no or reduced sterilizing N antibodies? The chart shows a downward trend of N and upward of S assuming if we went out farther in time, it might continue to change? I'm sure the answer is we don't know yet. What's disturbing is if it turns out that we are trending to spike only antibodies, it looks like the NI folks are going to be in the same boat as the only vaxed group? Meaning we now have a bigger problem with this group now suceptible to mutated variants as well as potentially being factories creating more variants? I hope I'm wrong???
I don't know how you find the time, but the depth and length of this post is impressive. Cheers