The link to the video doesn't work anymore; apparently the video has been removed. It doesn't appear to be available in the Internet archive either. Anybody know of a working link?
Twitch is a zen board except for prime users, apparently. His general page is here https://www.twitch.tv/gigaohmbiological/videos and he's slowly converting content to pdf at https://gigaohmbiological.com (there is a slot for ADE in the "papers" section but nothing has been posted yet). Much of his content is repeated - his videos are essentially in a sermon format. But the ADE discussion might not be in any live posts, I think. He's a unique element.
Thank you for providing further content to consider and digest on my daily walks.
How do you think the notion that natural immunity was somehow subpar or fatally incomplete initially propagated? Was it seemingly based solely on the idea that SARS-cov2 was entirely novel?
Essentially, my "benign" theory posits that the experts risked their reputation on an upsetting of durable natural immunity for the thrill of it, and when they turned out to be wrong, just doubled down on their bet. (Meanwhile they hedged on treatments incorrectly, and doubled down on their hedge.)
I’m making my way through Couey’s talk. So far one thing that is very interesting to me. On his coverage of event 201, the asian man talks of how healthcare workers shouldn’t say “I don’t know. That alone could cause problems.” I can say in my own hospital system, talk of covid takes a singular path. There is no deviation from the canon put forth by the CDC. The irony is that most of the physicians I work with are self proclaimed atheists. It is noteworthy and reminds me of the comments once made by Alan Watts in how science has replaced Christianity. In this we it seems these people have no choice but to place bets.
Yes, part of what I alluded to in my essay! In the pre-secular era, you could acknowledge mystery. This made rational thought *more* potent, because there was no need to cram every single observation into it.
His argument for enrichment of the spike protein is quite compelling. Secondarily is seems to coalesce with the increased viral load (increased replication being proportional to likelihood for mutations) within the distribution of leaky vaccines. It is amazing that the general public accepts the narrative. So I have it right, the vaccines selected for strains with a higher affinity for ACE2 and thus allowing for higher amounts of viral replication and load?
I would hazard to portray his theory as arguing that the spike protein is virtually unable to be further optimized; the Covid vaccines are just selecting for a handful of common "affinity-lateral" mutations which happen to escape the antibodies.
My guess is it's entirely driven by graft. The entire medical industry circled the wagons to sell vax. Pharma industry pays big bucks to maintain that loyalty.
The link to the video doesn't work anymore; apparently the video has been removed. It doesn't appear to be available in the Internet archive either. Anybody know of a working link?
There - he discusses it a bit starting at 1:31:15 of the most recent stream https://www.twitch.tv/videos/1181473332?t=01h31m15s
Twitch is a zen board except for prime users, apparently. His general page is here https://www.twitch.tv/gigaohmbiological/videos and he's slowly converting content to pdf at https://gigaohmbiological.com (there is a slot for ADE in the "papers" section but nothing has been posted yet). Much of his content is repeated - his videos are essentially in a sermon format. But the ADE discussion might not be in any live posts, I think. He's a unique element.
Thank you for providing further content to consider and digest on my daily walks.
How do you think the notion that natural immunity was somehow subpar or fatally incomplete initially propagated? Was it seemingly based solely on the idea that SARS-cov2 was entirely novel?
I laid out my "benign" theory for why the expert consensus "bet" against natural immunity here - https://unglossed.substack.com/p/how-to-lose-at-backgammon
Essentially, my "benign" theory posits that the experts risked their reputation on an upsetting of durable natural immunity for the thrill of it, and when they turned out to be wrong, just doubled down on their bet. (Meanwhile they hedged on treatments incorrectly, and doubled down on their hedge.)
I’m making my way through Couey’s talk. So far one thing that is very interesting to me. On his coverage of event 201, the asian man talks of how healthcare workers shouldn’t say “I don’t know. That alone could cause problems.” I can say in my own hospital system, talk of covid takes a singular path. There is no deviation from the canon put forth by the CDC. The irony is that most of the physicians I work with are self proclaimed atheists. It is noteworthy and reminds me of the comments once made by Alan Watts in how science has replaced Christianity. In this we it seems these people have no choice but to place bets.
Yes, part of what I alluded to in my essay! In the pre-secular era, you could acknowledge mystery. This made rational thought *more* potent, because there was no need to cram every single observation into it.
His argument for enrichment of the spike protein is quite compelling. Secondarily is seems to coalesce with the increased viral load (increased replication being proportional to likelihood for mutations) within the distribution of leaky vaccines. It is amazing that the general public accepts the narrative. So I have it right, the vaccines selected for strains with a higher affinity for ACE2 and thus allowing for higher amounts of viral replication and load?
I would hazard to portray his theory as arguing that the spike protein is virtually unable to be further optimized; the Covid vaccines are just selecting for a handful of common "affinity-lateral" mutations which happen to escape the antibodies.
Regarding the common theories that the Covid vaccines are somehow increasing viral loads, it might be time to short that stock https://www.eurosurveillance.org/content/10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2021.26.37.2100824
My guess is it's entirely driven by graft. The entire medical industry circled the wagons to sell vax. Pharma industry pays big bucks to maintain that loyalty.