Apologies for one more informal post. I mentioned over the weekend that I was writing an essay discussing the falsely-labeled “traditional” Covid vaccines, and considerations on antibody dependent enhancement. But discovering J.J. Couey’s eccentric and passionate videos, which are impressive, concentrated, and intuitively-grounded explanations of all these considerations and more, has rendered these subjects less urgent for me to discuss.
His discussion, yesterday (link expired; Couey’s Twitch channel page is here), of the various dangers of immune sensitization to the apparent “add-on” spike protein epitopes, for example (and lucid explanation for why a spike protein-focused inoculation is obviously more likely to generate an immune response targeting those add-on elements than natural infection would) are sufficient to render my own views on enhancement double-jeopardy at best.
Couey has removed all urgency to the two areas that were still driving me, an outsider, to litigate the false immunological narratives that other credentialed Covid vaccine skeptics do not sufficiently emphasize: The denial of the superiority of natural immunity to synthetic immunity, and the crucial import of confronting and refuting the artificially-perpetuated fear of the virus itself. I can therefore shift my focus more to continuing to deep-dive into specific misrepresented or potentially revelatory studies, and to the central political and philosophical debates. I will still post the “traditional” essay, hopefully by Friday.
For one thing, I do have a bit of a quibble with Couey’s intense glorification of T Cells. T Cells are just tomorrow’s antibodies; they and the various tests used to measure them will be as easily weaponized to convince lay people that they are lacking “protection” as the latter. My essay will argue that the naked eye and common sense cannot be surpassed as proxies for expected outcomes (put simply, that since natural infection to coronaviruses does not cause enhancement, and vaccination does, as observable to the naked eye, any novel coronavirus vaccine should be expected to cause enhancement). But for now, the topic of the legal precedent for vaccines mandates has gripped my attention, and will likely comprise tomorrow’s post.
For newer subscribers uninterested in either ADE or political philosophy, consider trying last month’s grand exploration of the myths, controversies, and medical malpractices surrounding the urinary microbiome, “The War on Pee.”
Thanks for subscribing to Unglossed!
The link to the video doesn't work anymore; apparently the video has been removed. It doesn't appear to be available in the Internet archive either. Anybody know of a working link?
Thank you for providing further content to consider and digest on my daily walks.
How do you think the notion that natural immunity was somehow subpar or fatally incomplete initially propagated? Was it seemingly based solely on the idea that SARS-cov2 was entirely novel?