170 Comments

I still think that my guesstimate from June 2021 of 120k deaths (fewer since, but some) is likely correct. It fit the German health insurer PKK's data *perfectly*, and we know the story from there: the CEO was immediately terminated and the info was taken offline. The 120k number is one that can blend into a lot of stats, and may include deaths there were about to happen anyway.

Expand full comment

I really wish we had good data on the general health of unvaxxed vs vaxxed (prior to the vax, I mean). To see "healthy user effect" for confounding variables. I found:

https://www.census.gov/library/stories/2021/12/who-are-the-adults-not-vaccinated-against-covid.html

Unvaxxed were more likely to be poor, uneducated, disabled, and unemployed. All of these correlate with lower health outcomes. However the unvaxxed are also younger on average. Age always has to be taken into account. They are more likely to think the virus is not a big deal (caring about hte virus can possibly be a marker for thinks like taking vitamins, which can actually help). They are also more likely to live alone, which could suggest negative outcomes beyond merely age differences.

This is not a random sample (hospital patients) but shows unvaxxed more likely to be obese: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35978558/

Expand full comment

Plaxovid working is very questionable, just see all the vaxxed and boosted top government officials including the president suffering from rebound. Also have an unvaxxed couple at church who were prescibed it and claimed they started to feel better quickly but then I asked if they felt worse a few days later and she agreed.

Expand full comment
Jan 12, 2023·edited Jan 12, 2023Liked by Brian Mowrey

Thanks for bringing the Unz, article up. I’d only read your commentary on it and not read his article till this afternoon. His analysis seems fair, but he himself says is not conclusive.

The tool he used (good find):

https://mpidr.shinyapps.io/stmortality/

Looks excellent, I’ve been slicing and dicing the Australian data with it for about an hours and learnt some surprising things about the pattern of deaths here in Oz that are counter to strongly held beliefs on both sides of the argument.

I tend to agree with you the more I look into it.

Expand full comment

My thoughts about the question "what if the stats never show the excess deaths from the very expensive injectable products that no one needed?"

Here is the problem. Smart people look at numbers and at reality. Reality is confusing and unsophisticated, monotonous and truly a bore. Unlike numbers, spreadsheets, graphics and animations.

Smart people are like children in that they prefer fantasy. So much fun with fantasy. My blood is composed of RBCs, plasma and imagination (and some debris of that insane garbage thrown from the definitely non-existent helioengineering planes.)

Now, back in the unreliable and boring reality. If people die from things that used to be weird and now are not weird (that classic heart attack all kids have around age 7 or 8) AND the official data says "everything is normal, nothing to see here" then I, as a member of the intuitive midwittery, must say that they are lying. A collection of numbers cannot change reality. Only the perception of reality of the people who have more faith in their wit than they ought to have.

Do the 125+ IQ champions believe they are immune from the attack of very seasoned Infowarriors who know all the tricks of Bernays' and Alinsky' books by heart?

Come on!

O number wizards! Picture yourself for a minute in the shoes of a 90-115 IQ tax-receptor. How could the members of the enemy class attack these people using your overdeveloped frontal lobes as a weapon?

Part of the answer is the trick that always works: flattery.

By the way, Brian, I love your substack. Seriously, it's surprisingly good for a Californian. I'm impressed at so much examples of sophisticated yet not totally useless thinking.

(End of the tangential and mostly sincere observation.)

Isn't Ron Unz one of the smartest among the smarterer class? Is he smart enough to know when he is being used without getting paid? A clue is that there is something like a valid contract when one is not being abused in the foresaid manner.

If I was an agent of chaos, with the mission to protect the criminals and being paid in some way to make sure the data is all scrambled and adulterated, and if part of my duties involved conflatabbergaslighting researchers of the truthering team, then I would take better care of me grammar and lexyc, and I would definitely insist in repeating ad nauseam that OFFICIAL DATA ALWAYS EQUALS REALITY OR ELSE YOUR AN ANTIVAXXXXER AND A SOVIET AND GAY!!!

(That's what several years of wikipedic radiation did to my poor brain.

Don't laugh at me, for I am sequi-innumerate and a special needs commenter.)

Over.

I hope you lolled a little.

Expand full comment

I have no interest in changing your mind Brian. Either you will act in good faith and explore sites that my have a different interpretation of the "the data" or you won't. It really is of no interest to me what you do. What I find sad is that your ego, pride or narcissism appears to be more involved in this exchange at this point than your intellect. So I'll bid you farewell. You have a nice long list of sites to explore should you wish things further.

Expand full comment
Jan 12, 2023Liked by Brian Mowrey

That deaths may have increased in 2020 because of a virus is not proven in view as the means to determine this was and maybe still is not available - at least not reliably.

Something was causing illness in 2020 but in a period of enforced isolation, separation, mass indiscriminate masking, job losses, business failures, restricted medical care and the highly promoted Plague threat, an increase in deaths should be expected - so maybe not viral at all. And then the C-Shots started and excess deaths have shot up it seems with a worldwide injection of materials into healthy people campaign of unprecedented scope and effectiveness. Vrial mutations? I do not see that as past evidence suggests follow-on mutated strains, if they exist, are more INFECTIVE and less AFFECTIVE. Why should the claimed Cov viral process be so different?

Expand full comment

I think the batch numbers were noted to places well outside the US-VAERS reporting area. There seems reasonable evidence that shot number three is a real lottery and for some a much higher likelihood of a serious event. Then there is the issue of possible lowered 'immune response' ( Have a different view of so called immunity than mainstream ).

The supposedly LOW numbers of Un-V'd in hospital may be partly by choice (stay away) but cannot be ruled out entirely as 'not sick'.

Vaccination by design is meant to inject the healthy, which appears to have occurred in large numbers so the excess deaths amongst seeming ly healthy is a link that must be explained - truthfully. Claims need evidence to support them or they fail as null and void.

Expand full comment

If it looks like a duck, talks like a duck, and walks like a duck - it might be ("vaccine-induced excess deaths"). Or geez, maybe instead it's really an overweight unicorn?

Expand full comment
Jan 11, 2023Liked by Brian Mowrey

2 Points.

First the study on different batch/lot numbers suggested a range of effects, most less than a seasonal Flu shot but some corresponded with significant negative effects. So not all C-Shots may be the same so expect differing numbers. Cumulative effects? Probably though not impossible.

Second there IS an apparent significant rise in Excess Deaths and it is happening worldwide to varying but similar degrees, ie same direction upwards ALL apparently co-incidental with the rollout of C-shots. Does not prove anything except.......

SOMETHING IS HAPPENING HERE - NOT NORMAL - SO WHYEE? Its a signal and not proof of any cause but people will defend what they believe while none can deny the reality..

SOMETHING IS HAPPENING HERE WITH EXCESS DEATHS - WHAT CHANGED WORLDWIDE?

Expand full comment
Jan 11, 2023·edited Jan 11, 2023

There is a graphic from El Gato Malo on twitter at this post: https://twitter.com/boriquagato/status/1613135281187700737

It shows the All Cause Mortality Relative Risk for males aged 18-39 (and also for 40-49) by vaccination status, with unvaccinated as 1.0.

It shows a huge jump for 1 shot (3.5 times the risk of unvaccinated) followed by a decline to about 1.25 for the second shot and then an increase to about 1.8 for the third shot.

Now, this seems interesting to me. It seems like the first shot is killing off those susceptible to the #ClotShot pretty heavily, so by the time of the second and third shot there are no longer so many susceptibles available.

Does that sound like a reasonable interpretation?

OK, here's a substack posting on it with more age ranges. Some weird things happening but it does look like the more #ClotShots you get the more likely you are to die:

https://boriquagato.substack.com/p/another-look-at-uk-all-cause-mortality

Expand full comment
Jan 11, 2023Liked by Brian Mowrey

Young athletes and bodybuilders are dying sometimes in the middle of strenuous activity and sometimes while sleeping or walking. This doesn't fit with "obesity". It also suggests there there could be two different mechanisms for triggering the final fatal event sequence.

Expand full comment
Jan 11, 2023Liked by Brian Mowrey

So why are we not following Fenton on this? I don’t see obvious errors in his analysis. There is a temporal pattern in deaths which doesn’t just track Covid and there is no temporal pattern in obesity. https://open.substack.com/pub/wherearethenumbers/p/the-devils-advocate-an-exploratory?r=15nw2j&utm_medium=ios&utm_campaign=post

Expand full comment
Jan 11, 2023Liked by Brian Mowrey

Unz’s site is for perspectives that are almost completely excluded from the mainstream media not just “fringe-y, white-supremacist-adjacent content.” E.g. he publishes various leftists, various alternative-economic perspectives, various writers who have a different take on Russia, Ron Paul-ish libertarian content, etc.

And the “fringe-y, white-supremacist-adjacent content” is generally more like “European people(s) soon won’t exist as distinct, self-governing ethnies and that’s bad” and “the self-evident idea that all populations are entirely empirically equal isn’t self-evident at all.”

Oh – and Unz himself (he’s ethnically though not religiously Jewish) has written some incredibly controversial things about the Jewish people. E.g. look up his take on the classic anti-semitic blood libel against the Jews. I was quite shocked at what he wrote. So he’s not just an OUTLET for fringe-y ideas, he’s also a source.

Yeah I think you’re right about the shot and the data will eventually show it.

Expand full comment
Jan 11, 2023Liked by Brian Mowrey

This effort by el gato malo suggests the vaccines are killing people, but mainly ages 10-39 and 80+. He combined to data sets from UK ONS to compute vaxxed and unvaxxed death rates by age bracket. I downloaded the data and computed May myself. It largely agrees with his results. The only think I can't figure out, suggesting there is more to this, is that deaths were slightly lower in the vaccinated in Jan 2022, but increased linearly until they were much higher by May.

https://boriquagato.substack.com/p/uk-age-stratified-all-cause-death

Expand full comment