13 Comments
Apr 9, 2022Liked by Brian Mowrey

So my overall sense of outrage/injury makes me want every study to "prove" that the vax is creating exactly what was predicted by warnings of Geert Van den Bossche. Only because in real world examples the denial of vaccine injury are pervasive. We recently had a patient 30 year old woman came in to the psyche unit with severe depression r/t new onset migraines and tinnitus, tremors, severe paroxysmal tachycardia...onset 3 days after 2nd vaccine. No previous issues at all. Looking through the chart, my daughter who works as a CNA offered the possible explanation of vaccine injury and was shot down. (even though her NP quietly admitted she could be right). Meanwhile every test imaginable was done to find out what was going on. Of course they found nothing so discharge was planned, she was started on antidepressants and before she left the physicians encouraged her to take the booster. She declined. So anyway I love the deep science even though I usually have to read these studies several times to understand, even remotely, what is being said. Back to my first statement, you, and a couple other science type stacks, keep me HONEST.

Brian I recognize that you have devoted a lot of time simplifying these ideas for me. I would love to know what you think about Geert and his ideas, the VAERS reports, sudden deaths, collapse of athletes ect. I realize there is a difference subjective/objective but the ongoing denial of anything but the "safe and effective" vaccine narrative continues to perpetuate vaccine injury INJURY.

When I began this journey I diligently read all the most current studies from journals about covid immunity of the infected. The studies, month after month post covid onset all found "broad and durable" immunity. Then the vaccine came along and suddenly, even though the "broad and durable" immunity was still acknowledged..." by almost everybody (except that idiot at the NIH leading the country in worship hymns to himself) "BUT, you should get the vaccine as additional protection, because we don't know how long natural immunity will last".

I'm probably going to have a heart attack because of my continuous head spinning frustration, but at least they won't be able to attribute it to a "coincidence" post vaccine.

Expand full comment

Thanks for the quick run down! I've noticed a few people squeezing too much information out of neutralizing antibodies when comparing Ba.1 to Ba.2. Some studies may show a reduction in neutralization by 1.5 which sounds quite scary but we don't know if that means it stops working. In most of these studies the wildtype neutralization tends to drop by a factor in the 30s, which is even more telling. I think this makes it easy for people to interpret major concerns when there is none. And like you said these assays don't tell us much about immunity overall.

There are some places in the US where cases are rising by a lot. Actually, PCR test positivity is on the rise. What does that mean? I don't know. Even when I did PCR testing I never got information about the severity of illness- just that there are X many positive people that were tested. This really is an interesting time where if we stop reporting PCR positivity then would we even know we are still in a pandemic? It's quite the social experiment.

And thanks for that Crawford piece. I just skimmed it a bit (I wonder how he got his post to fit!) and it's interesting that people came out of nowhere to try to smear Paul Marek. I guess some people find this as a way to gain notoriety?

Expand full comment

actually requiring medical care would seem an eminently better proxy for an illness named Severe Acute anything than a useless overamplified PCR test with staggeringly useless level of false positives.

Expand full comment