I think there is a simpler explanation. The vaccine is a foreign substance. The body fights it. IE throws up an immune response. However this vaccine, unlike others continues to replicate. And it appears to spread through the body over time. So the body is in constant fight mode against it, whatever it is. Six months later another dose of something is given. Is it the same? Is it different? Who knows, right. But the body then gets another bout to contend with. It is now in a two front war. Constantly. Then a three front war six months later. Along comes anything...a bug of some sort. Ordinarily the body could slough it off because the immune system is functioning. It is functioning, but it has been fragmented now three times. Maybe you have 25% of your immune strength available. Variants therefore aren’t being created. You’re just getting sick. It could be an old bug. It could be an allergen. But in any event you’re in a street fight with three thugs and someone else comes along and steals your phone which fell out of your pocket. Ordinarily, no problem. Only now you’re tied up. And you lose your phone.
Since I believe OAS is not real, obviously I believe that the seeming negative efficacy of the injections has another cause. In fact I have often proposed essentially what you are proposing - general innate immune suppression from high inflammation from damage from the injections, similar to the immune suppression in diabetes.
Thank you for all your work. Please forgive me for asking questions that might seem irrelevant. I am just trying to understand what is going on because of all the people who do not have a voice any more.
- Why hide exclusive "interferon spray inhibitor" for SARS which Chen Wei invented to keep her staff safe ( and kept her staff safe)?
- GGL and D- peptide inhibitors from HIV-1 gp41 could be used as potential inhibitirs for SARS -CoV entry, why they are not being used?
- Why they are hiding the AEROSOL version of peptide fusion inhibitor Gallaher & Gary created to keep themselves safe?
- Why vaccinate with injectable bioweapon or whatever you would call whats currently in the vaccines?
Sorry I missed this comment at the time. I don't do a lot of research into therapeutics but I think Kennedy Jr's account of Fauci's motives for botching treatment is very plausible; and if there is anyone "behind" the public-facing decisions then they probably just want to depop the planet. In the meantime we'll probably just have to live with uncertainty!
Well, why do wuhan-1 vaccinated people have generally longer disease courses with omicron than unvaxed? Seen this in my social setting, I was sick for two days and was back on my bike, never tested Pos, while my boosted friends were positive for 6-14 days. My boss was Pos for three weeks even. Surely there is some merit to the idea of "outdated" antibodies induced by obsolete vaccines impeding immune response to evolved viruses? I really like your idea of "masking" active introduction of new engineered viruses by blaming it on escape variants though; the binary messaging-on-rails is easy to observe and this is a very elegant explanation.
Right, that is the most frequent question, and there's lots of possibilities besides OAS, which are far more conservative theoretically or are better supported by research, but they don't get discussed because they don't drive hits on substack, basically.
I think the latter is the most likely as far as prolonged infection and increased paxlovid rebound. The IgG4 antibodies are suppressing T Cells that should be killing infected cells displaying spike protein. There is a role for imprinting in this, as I have written before, since even if the B Cell pool can remodel to adapt for variants, it is still going to be IgG4, T Cell-suppressing B Cells https://unglossed.substack.com/p/the-actual-imprinting-study
Thanks for the answer. So are you saying that the claim of “leaky vaccines”, presumably having some connection to OAS, are not in fact driving the creation of variants? Your theory of there being more GOF releases certainly resonates with me. 
"But let us imagine, purely for the sake of thought-experiment, that both the MSM and counter-narrative explanations for BA.4 and BA.5 are scripted ops. In this thought experiment, there is a credentialed expert warning the “awake” few that the Covid vaccines will accelerate immune escape, while the orthodox news assures the “asleep” masses that this faster mutation is something natural and accidental.
This scripted pretend-oppositional framing, much like the debate between a “lab leak” and zoonotic cross-over, would seem to have one simple and obvious purpose: To suck oxygen away from any discussion about intentional global bioterrorism."
So that's definitely something I am suspicious of in general with the "leaky vaccine" tropes, at least when it is people with credentials sounding the alarms. There is no "leaky vaccines cause doom" rule in human vaccine use. Lots of human vaccines are leaky. (Some are plausibly going to create Marek's-effect high-pathogenicity viruses eventually, like in a few decades for chickenpox and hepatitis viruses; but this is case by case and I don't think it applies to coronaviruses, and certainly hasn't applied to flu).
The scripted pro wrestling stuff ultimately has nothing to do with the science, though.
I am interested in what happens in the body.
When I see GVB discuss this, I don't see a person who is operating at the behest of a script.
Sure, maybe he is the greatest actor in the history of acting, but I doubt it.
Similarly I never think Yeadon is lying, ever.
Yeadon and GVB seem to have some disagreements. Which is great, that's science. There are discrepancies, sure, but I don't see people running scripts.
So I walk away as a layperson, and I read you, and I just think..."they don't really know. There is disagreement. They don't really know. If I were to try to bring up another person up to speed, I would lead with that: There is disagreement at the top levels about what is happening.
Honest men (& women), very intelligent and educated, who cannot believe intentional global bioterrorism is actually happening, will search their knowledge base for another explanation that fits the evidence. It may not be the best fit, but it is feasible.
It is very hard for honest people to conceive of the possibility that global bioterrorism is in our midst.
My recommendation is not to walk away, but to cross-check in pubmed. There is no "leaky vaccine" school. So, I am suspicious of the alleged acolyte of the Ancient Leaky Vaccine Science Prophesies. This has nothing to do with Yeadon, who I admire.
It's not really about "admiring" a person. That's like a straight up appeal to authority, like..."I know a guy who is good with transmissions, give him a call."
At this point, is it simply safe to say that the elitest of the elite do not agree and simply do not know what is going on?
Have we not learned that scientific journals are compromised? Paid off?
I am genuinely not trying to be difficult. We are TWO and one half years into this, and the smarties don't seem to agree on even the most BASIC assertions.
There are contagious experiences of illness. There are non-human mediums like animals, eggs, or cell cultures which amplify the likelihood of transmitting these experiences. There are super-dilutions of these amplified products that make it unlikely to include rare elements, which is unfortunately described as "isolation." There are genetic sequences that can be produced. There are sequence-encoded amino acid constructs which describe a physical delivery product for self-replicating genes, which accounts for contagious experiences of illness as experienced by the naked eye. It all seems at least as plausible as any spiritual explanation. The alternative is to believe nature is ego-driven and wouldn't dare segregate genes from the cells they operate upon. That's just make-believe.
Something made me very ill in unique and horrible ways in Spring, 2020.
Two years later and I read A Midwestern Doctor who has treated many patients, and she lays out many of the exact same phenomena that I encountered.
Do you understand that Yeadon, who you admire, and I do as well, has made a determination very similar as your working conclusion that OAS does not exist, is a myth....Yeadon has done roughly the same with the paradigm of a respiratory virus known as SARS-COV2?
I am only asking the most basic questions that TWO FREAKING YEARS INTO THIS are...what? Unsettled? Still?
I have read some of what you and others have written about OAS but I need to go back to the beginning: was OAS a false theory pushed to pursue a particular agenda and if so, what is that agenda? Or is an error in analysis that has stuck with us, and if so what have been the consequences of that?
Getting my basic bearings will help me follow your analysis. Thanks 😊
Oh - your comment wasn't loading in my browser at first. I replied below but will move it here:
A lot of biology is built on erroneous foundations, which is why outside writers in both mainstream and alt media alleging to their audience that something is "well observed" just because an abstract says so, without a bit of skepticism or homework-doing, are committing malpractice.
I have done the homework. OAS is not real.
Back to the origin. Biology falls into these traps because of confirmation bias, emotional investment, and financial incentives. It is always "easier" to fake evidence for a previous claim than to acknowledge having misspoken. So that alone is enough to explain OAS. Francis made the claim; the data didn't actually support it; he and his collaborators faked the data. The stodgy, stupid "sin" label seemed to garner the claim more interest even though his faked claim didn't imply a detriment. But he doesn't come out and clear that one up; he lets the reader imagine a secret detriment. That's basically my gist of how it played out.
I have speculated that there might be some type of agenda in the modern revival - some type of "op" to blame vaccines for super-variants that are clearly coming out of a lab (Omicron siblings) - but after reviewing the studies, it seems like more of a continued comedy of errors.
Sorry - was this comment meant to refer to my comment or to the series at large? My comment is just about "science is human, it makes a lot of mistakes"
To hear "viruses don't exist" in my flu series is just appeal to (non-questioning of) authority. Well, then you've chosen your authority, and the masses have chosen theirs.
The vaccines are self-spreading (making it somewhat irrelevant what the original illness was) so we are being slowly poisoned, and variants are just released to add more cycles for vaccine "updates".
I think there is a simpler explanation. The vaccine is a foreign substance. The body fights it. IE throws up an immune response. However this vaccine, unlike others continues to replicate. And it appears to spread through the body over time. So the body is in constant fight mode against it, whatever it is. Six months later another dose of something is given. Is it the same? Is it different? Who knows, right. But the body then gets another bout to contend with. It is now in a two front war. Constantly. Then a three front war six months later. Along comes anything...a bug of some sort. Ordinarily the body could slough it off because the immune system is functioning. It is functioning, but it has been fragmented now three times. Maybe you have 25% of your immune strength available. Variants therefore aren’t being created. You’re just getting sick. It could be an old bug. It could be an allergen. But in any event you’re in a street fight with three thugs and someone else comes along and steals your phone which fell out of your pocket. Ordinarily, no problem. Only now you’re tied up. And you lose your phone.
Since I believe OAS is not real, obviously I believe that the seeming negative efficacy of the injections has another cause. In fact I have often proposed essentially what you are proposing - general innate immune suppression from high inflammation from damage from the injections, similar to the immune suppression in diabetes.
Thank you for all your work. Please forgive me for asking questions that might seem irrelevant. I am just trying to understand what is going on because of all the people who do not have a voice any more.
- Why hide exclusive "interferon spray inhibitor" for SARS which Chen Wei invented to keep her staff safe ( and kept her staff safe)?
- GGL and D- peptide inhibitors from HIV-1 gp41 could be used as potential inhibitirs for SARS -CoV entry, why they are not being used?
- Why they are hiding the AEROSOL version of peptide fusion inhibitor Gallaher & Gary created to keep themselves safe?
- Why vaccinate with injectable bioweapon or whatever you would call whats currently in the vaccines?
Grateful if you would consider replying 🙏
Sorry I missed this comment at the time. I don't do a lot of research into therapeutics but I think Kennedy Jr's account of Fauci's motives for botching treatment is very plausible; and if there is anyone "behind" the public-facing decisions then they probably just want to depop the planet. In the meantime we'll probably just have to live with uncertainty!
Well, why do wuhan-1 vaccinated people have generally longer disease courses with omicron than unvaxed? Seen this in my social setting, I was sick for two days and was back on my bike, never tested Pos, while my boosted friends were positive for 6-14 days. My boss was Pos for three weeks even. Surely there is some merit to the idea of "outdated" antibodies induced by obsolete vaccines impeding immune response to evolved viruses? I really like your idea of "masking" active introduction of new engineered viruses by blaming it on escape variants though; the binary messaging-on-rails is easy to observe and this is a very elegant explanation.
Right, that is the most frequent question, and there's lots of possibilities besides OAS, which are far more conservative theoretically or are better supported by research, but they don't get discussed because they don't drive hits on substack, basically.
There's simple immune suppression from 1st-order harms of the vaccine (akin to suppression from diabetes or another chronic inflammatory condition), innate immune reprogramming (https://arkmedic.substack.com/p/who-owns-who , I may do my own post on this study today) and tolerance (https://unglossed.substack.com/p/boosting-tolerance-igg4).
I think the latter is the most likely as far as prolonged infection and increased paxlovid rebound. The IgG4 antibodies are suppressing T Cells that should be killing infected cells displaying spike protein. There is a role for imprinting in this, as I have written before, since even if the B Cell pool can remodel to adapt for variants, it is still going to be IgG4, T Cell-suppressing B Cells https://unglossed.substack.com/p/the-actual-imprinting-study
Ah, just realized my comment is kind of self-defeating but I'll leave it up anyway. Ernie said what I was thinking, just much clearer.
Thanks for the answer. So are you saying that the claim of “leaky vaccines”, presumably having some connection to OAS, are not in fact driving the creation of variants? Your theory of there being more GOF releases certainly resonates with me. 
Right, I have teased this theory before - https://unglossed.substack.com/p/thank-you-sars-may-i-have-another -
"But let us imagine, purely for the sake of thought-experiment, that both the MSM and counter-narrative explanations for BA.4 and BA.5 are scripted ops. In this thought experiment, there is a credentialed expert warning the “awake” few that the Covid vaccines will accelerate immune escape, while the orthodox news assures the “asleep” masses that this faster mutation is something natural and accidental.
This scripted pretend-oppositional framing, much like the debate between a “lab leak” and zoonotic cross-over, would seem to have one simple and obvious purpose: To suck oxygen away from any discussion about intentional global bioterrorism."
So that's definitely something I am suspicious of in general with the "leaky vaccine" tropes, at least when it is people with credentials sounding the alarms. There is no "leaky vaccines cause doom" rule in human vaccine use. Lots of human vaccines are leaky. (Some are plausibly going to create Marek's-effect high-pathogenicity viruses eventually, like in a few decades for chickenpox and hepatitis viruses; but this is case by case and I don't think it applies to coronaviruses, and certainly hasn't applied to flu).
The scripted pro wrestling stuff ultimately has nothing to do with the science, though.
I am interested in what happens in the body.
When I see GVB discuss this, I don't see a person who is operating at the behest of a script.
Sure, maybe he is the greatest actor in the history of acting, but I doubt it.
Similarly I never think Yeadon is lying, ever.
Yeadon and GVB seem to have some disagreements. Which is great, that's science. There are discrepancies, sure, but I don't see people running scripts.
So I walk away as a layperson, and I read you, and I just think..."they don't really know. There is disagreement. They don't really know. If I were to try to bring up another person up to speed, I would lead with that: There is disagreement at the top levels about what is happening.
Would that be a correct assessment? Accurate?
Honest men (& women), very intelligent and educated, who cannot believe intentional global bioterrorism is actually happening, will search their knowledge base for another explanation that fits the evidence. It may not be the best fit, but it is feasible.
It is very hard for honest people to conceive of the possibility that global bioterrorism is in our midst.
I fully believe that this is bioterrorism and that has FUCK ALL to do with what I'm asking.
100% Agree.
Wow
My recommendation is not to walk away, but to cross-check in pubmed. There is no "leaky vaccine" school. So, I am suspicious of the alleged acolyte of the Ancient Leaky Vaccine Science Prophesies. This has nothing to do with Yeadon, who I admire.
It's not really about "admiring" a person. That's like a straight up appeal to authority, like..."I know a guy who is good with transmissions, give him a call."
At this point, is it simply safe to say that the elitest of the elite do not agree and simply do not know what is going on?
Sure, I could go to Pub Med.
Have we not learned that scientific journals are compromised? Paid off?
I am genuinely not trying to be difficult. We are TWO and one half years into this, and the smarties don't seem to agree on even the most BASIC assertions.
Brian, is there such thing as SARS-Cov-2?
There are contagious experiences of illness. There are non-human mediums like animals, eggs, or cell cultures which amplify the likelihood of transmitting these experiences. There are super-dilutions of these amplified products that make it unlikely to include rare elements, which is unfortunately described as "isolation." There are genetic sequences that can be produced. There are sequence-encoded amino acid constructs which describe a physical delivery product for self-replicating genes, which accounts for contagious experiences of illness as experienced by the naked eye. It all seems at least as plausible as any spiritual explanation. The alternative is to believe nature is ego-driven and wouldn't dare segregate genes from the cells they operate upon. That's just make-believe.
Brian, I tend to believe all of this as well.
Something made me very ill in unique and horrible ways in Spring, 2020.
Two years later and I read A Midwestern Doctor who has treated many patients, and she lays out many of the exact same phenomena that I encountered.
Do you understand that Yeadon, who you admire, and I do as well, has made a determination very similar as your working conclusion that OAS does not exist, is a myth....Yeadon has done roughly the same with the paradigm of a respiratory virus known as SARS-COV2?
I am only asking the most basic questions that TWO FREAKING YEARS INTO THIS are...what? Unsettled? Still?
I like your thought process here. 👍🏽
I have read some of what you and others have written about OAS but I need to go back to the beginning: was OAS a false theory pushed to pursue a particular agenda and if so, what is that agenda? Or is an error in analysis that has stuck with us, and if so what have been the consequences of that?
Getting my basic bearings will help me follow your analysis. Thanks 😊
Oh - your comment wasn't loading in my browser at first. I replied below but will move it here:
A lot of biology is built on erroneous foundations, which is why outside writers in both mainstream and alt media alleging to their audience that something is "well observed" just because an abstract says so, without a bit of skepticism or homework-doing, are committing malpractice.
I have done the homework. OAS is not real.
Back to the origin. Biology falls into these traps because of confirmation bias, emotional investment, and financial incentives. It is always "easier" to fake evidence for a previous claim than to acknowledge having misspoken. So that alone is enough to explain OAS. Francis made the claim; the data didn't actually support it; he and his collaborators faked the data. The stodgy, stupid "sin" label seemed to garner the claim more interest even though his faked claim didn't imply a detriment. But he doesn't come out and clear that one up; he lets the reader imagine a secret detriment. That's basically my gist of how it played out.
I have speculated that there might be some type of agenda in the modern revival - some type of "op" to blame vaccines for super-variants that are clearly coming out of a lab (Omicron siblings) - but after reviewing the studies, it seems like more of a continued comedy of errors.
Mowrey this is all incredibly confusing for normal people.
edit: Is it confusing to you?
Sorry - was this comment meant to refer to my comment or to the series at large? My comment is just about "science is human, it makes a lot of mistakes"
Generally. Overall.
If I'm a layperson right now, here is what I hear and read:
Viruses don't exist.
Original antigenic sin doesn't exist.
Leaky vaccines are not a problem.
Do you see the dilemma for a person that must now select a theory like a coat of paint and apply it in their life?
To hear "viruses don't exist" in my flu series is just appeal to (non-questioning of) authority. Well, then you've chosen your authority, and the masses have chosen theirs.
I don't really understand this, and I want to.
I believe in an objective reality.
I am not a scientist. Thus, I have no other option but to select an "authority" to trust.
Many of the masses have chosen other authorities.
Many of the authorities that I had previously chosen, say, medical doctors, have been revealed to be severely lacking.
Thus, the quandary. What is the objective reality? It does exist. It's not fantasy, or mythology. Something is in fact, real.
From another layperson; add to your list:
The vaccines are self-spreading (making it somewhat irrelevant what the original illness was) so we are being slowly poisoned, and variants are just released to add more cycles for vaccine "updates".