Highly interesting lessons in pattern recognition, thanks. One thing I have yet to comprehend is that this codes for amino acids, apparently gets into the cell nucleus, etc. Supposedly there is a synthetic mRNA present and yet so many seriously question the presence of a synthetic mRNA. Can you address this succinctly enough that it may be generally shared with those w/o a science background?
Thanks for your detailed work. Did you also include the source of who published these sequences? I'd be interested in e.g. a European team independently determining the sequence starting from scratch.
An accidental bio disaster or intentional culling would know the sequences, and be able to tamper with the most controversial before publishing the info in the public databases. For instance, HCG peptides have not been directly revealed to my knowledge, yet decades of HCG anti-fertility testing has occurred; altering documentation of a few letters in a 5-peptide string would disguise its presence.
This reminds me of that song "Blinding me with science". Why are viruses themselves not questioned? How do we know what a virus is? Many eminent doctors such as Dr Robert O. Young, Anthony Kaufman, Tom Cowan and lots more, have been speaking about the fraudulent way viruses are isolated. Why is this question always treated with ignore-ance? Total ingore-ance. How can we get our head around the science if this basic question is not acknowledged?
Ty Barney
Brian ... you GOT to watch this one. I have no words, but I think among all people ... you are going to find it interesting.
https://www.twitch.tv/videos/1660073740 (start at 04.00)
Dude...You need to re-upload those two images at the beginning. There's no picture, just a bunch of gibberish.
Highly interesting lessons in pattern recognition, thanks. One thing I have yet to comprehend is that this codes for amino acids, apparently gets into the cell nucleus, etc. Supposedly there is a synthetic mRNA present and yet so many seriously question the presence of a synthetic mRNA. Can you address this succinctly enough that it may be generally shared with those w/o a science background?
Thanks for your detailed work. Did you also include the source of who published these sequences? I'd be interested in e.g. a European team independently determining the sequence starting from scratch.
An accidental bio disaster or intentional culling would know the sequences, and be able to tamper with the most controversial before publishing the info in the public databases. For instance, HCG peptides have not been directly revealed to my knowledge, yet decades of HCG anti-fertility testing has occurred; altering documentation of a few letters in a 5-peptide string would disguise its presence.
Released by shedding vaccines maybe?
This reminds me of that song "Blinding me with science". Why are viruses themselves not questioned? How do we know what a virus is? Many eminent doctors such as Dr Robert O. Young, Anthony Kaufman, Tom Cowan and lots more, have been speaking about the fraudulent way viruses are isolated. Why is this question always treated with ignore-ance? Total ingore-ance. How can we get our head around the science if this basic question is not acknowledged?
Now where are the PCR gene
assay targets and if you BLAST search them what else contains them?
Inb4 NAV hoards.
Yeah, but do you have a picture of the virus holding up todays newspaper?