It's my personal mission in life to offer this 2018 paper by Peter Hotez whenever his name comes up. Shamelessly opportunistic and self-serving, the article is for those who are scientists in name only. I avoid ad hominem attacks, so I am being perfectly objective when I describe Hotez as "loathsome".
He's obviously still following his own personal marketing plan, with the rumored goal of being named Anthony Fauci's successor as head of NIAID. I just checked, and six months after the departure of Fauci, the agency still only has an "Acting Director", Hugh Auchincloss, M.D.
It's my personal mission in life to offer this 2018 paper by Peter Hotez whenever his name comes up. Shamelessly opportunistic and self-serving, the article is for those who are scientists in name only. I avoid ad hominem attacks, so I am being perfectly objective when I describe Hotez as "loathsome".
He's obviously still following his own personal marketing plan, with the rumored goal of being named Anthony Fauci's successor as head of NIAID. I just checked, and six months after the departure of Fauci, the agency still only has an "Acting Director", Hugh Auchincloss, M.D.
"Crafting your scientist brand" by Peter Hotez (2018) https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article?id=10.1371/journal.pbio.3000024
+10 for any mention, no matter how peripheral, of my favorite movie Brazil.
https://rumble.com/v2fsxne-conference-of-la-quinta-columna-the-game-is-over.html
I like this format of a touching on several different topics, interspersed in the longer in depth posts.
Interesting take on die hard, I never thought of that.