21 Comments
Nov 22, 2022Liked by Brian Mowrey

Wow

Wish every mom would read this

Expand full comment

Great article! Linking to you https://igorchudov.substack.com/p/is-rsv-more-severe-in-covid-vaccinated

Expand full comment
Nov 17, 2022Liked by Brian Mowrey

"The authors checked for spike protein and report that all donors were negative. This is relieving. It should be noted, however, that anti-spike antibodies can mask circulating spike or S1 as long as said antibodies outnumber the antigen, as was confirmed by Röltgen, et al.2"

How can circulating antibodies mask the detection of the spike protein? If I had to look for spike protein in this type of sample I would probably try either western blotting or mass spectrometry of some kind, both of which will not be impaired by antibodies. Elisa type assays could probably be impaired, though.

Expand full comment
Nov 16, 2022Liked by Brian Mowrey

Most of this post is beyond my scientific training--I could do a little research and probably come up to speed, but let me ask this: my daughter was born January 2022. My partner got the jabs (the first two that constituted one) in July 2021 on the advice of her doctor in order for him to “feel safe” about us traveling to Europe in August.

I was never going to justify the hysteria by getting jabbed (nor did I for a second believe the people pushing this garbage), but my partner felt it was the prudent thing to do because we are old and she really did not want to take any chances in losing the baby. So, I let her make the decision as to what to do. I, and then she soon after, got Covid in September 2021. Some vaccine.

Anyways, my daughter was born on time. Natural delivery.

She has met all of her milestones. She is healthy (as far as appearances go) and eating and sleeping well. She is a joy.

Here, finally, the question: What, if anything, should I be looking for as to adverse events stemming from the snake oil she was invariably exposed to in the womb? Should I have her get blood work done? What future issues could come about from her being exposed to that gene therapy sold as a “vaccine.”

Expand full comment

"...but hopefully not as-bad-as-it-looks finding for babies born from Covid-vaccinated mothers."

Two words that have left our pharma discourse: Precautionary Principle

Expand full comment
Nov 15, 2022Liked by Brian Mowrey

The question I'd like to ask of pregnant women who are injecting the Covid vax is .... are you still eschewing that coffee and that glass of wine you crave? Why don't you just go for it .... since you have agreed to shoot an experimental substance into your body.

Expand full comment
Nov 15, 2022·edited Nov 15, 2022Liked by Brian Mowrey

I guess have to give up the preaching about GENE MODIFICATIONS by the injections, people just do not listen.... Just found that one, from Transfusion. 2019 Dec;59(12):3560-3569. "A modified CD34+ hematopoietic stem and progenitor cell isolation strategy from cryopreserved human umbilical cord blood". It is about proper CD34+ isolation using CD34 microbead magnetic-activated cell sorting isolation. The conclusion is telling a LOT:"Importantly, the isolated CD34 + HSPCs possess in vivo repopulating activity in immunodeficient mice, making them a suitable starting population for ex vivo culture and gene editing."

And here another one from 2014 at: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24666342/

"Effect of maternal iron status on the number of CD34+ stem cells harvested from umbilical cord blood"

with the conclusion, quote: "This study indicates that lower numbers of CD34+ cells are more likely to occur when collected from mothers with higher SF. This finding suggests that maternal SF and associated iron status play a significant, but as yet undefined, role in the generation of CD34+ cells in UCB." the SF stands for serum ferritin, the iron storage protein.

=> looks like the iron, the metal giving our blood the red color, is being re-shuffled.

Expand full comment

An interesting perspective. I noted, and maybe you may be aware Brian, that I was unsure of the actual immunization date with respect to the timing/trimester of the pregnancy, or whether the immunization occurred prior to the pregnancy.

On its own this study is concerning, but it's similar to other studies that exist in a vacuum. The literature seems to be somewhat devoid of evidence of insults during pregnancy (at least with respect to vaccination), although there appears to be some evidence of the effects of infection during pregnancy having some influence.

The problem is that pregnancy just overall appears to be a very precarious situation. The foods, drug habits, sleeping habits, exercise habits. Everything a mother does is likely to influence the development of a baby.

It's funny, because it reminds me of a lecture Robert Sapolsky gave once about nature vs nurture and figuring out exactly when one would occur over the other, and he even brought up the nurture aspect of being in the womb and all that.

So I think this study provides some interesting information, but I'm just unaware of what data to use as a reference.

Expand full comment