We’re in England. Think we had covid Nov/Dec’19 - caught from contact at Gatwick Airport - they, and the 3 of us that caught it, didn’t catch delta off family member 18 months later but did catch omicron Dec ‘21. One is blood donor and donated 6 weeks prior to and 6 weeks after suspected infection ( and 3 monthly since). They donated convalescent plasma in May’20 and told antibodies too low to be useful ( defined as less than 6). I wrote to haematologist ( I’m a retired GP) and asked if they could assess for covid antibodies in all pre and post donations - they replied ‘not my job’. I tried to prove it was here earlier but was powerless.
• Italy: “The earliest sample with evidence of SARS-CoV-2 RNA was from September 12, 2019.”
• In Oct 2019 the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation co-hosted “Event 201” , in which 15 global business, government, and public health leaders took part in a simulation exercise based on responding to an international “coronavirus” pandemic. The first report of COVID-19 occurred in Nov 2019.
• In many cities (Barcelona , Buenos Aires , Florianopolis , Milan , etc.) COVID-19 was detected in sewage waters at least one month prior to the alleged Dec 2020 wet market spread, but not before Nov 2020, yet it is a proxy of about 2 weeks earlier than public PCR-case statistics.
One very odd thing about this debacle has been that knowledge of novelty would have given governments an out for getting everything totally wrong about virulence, mode of spread, effectiveness of restrictions, lack of any prior immunity and so on.
At any time they could have said: sorry folks about all that, we actually knew it was novel but couldn’t tell you all as there would have been mass panic, and because it was novel we had to assume no immunity, and limit spread etc.
Now we know that notwithstanding the novelty our immune systems can cope it’s all over guys!! Let’s celebrate!
They could have sold that, but instead chose to dismantle society, which suggests there really was another agenda.
How certain are you that the RT-PCR that Kari Mullis stated strongly will not, can not identify, ie detect, a specific viral component, it simply amplifies everything put into the process? Also what about Cycle thresholds, the Ct values that are mostly never mentioned and yet can be so critical to what the PCR makes 'visible'. to the observer?
Antibodies have been shown to be a very poor indicator of immunity and without clear clinical evidence is it possible to say with certain ty that any antibody believed related to SARS-Cov-2 is specific to only that entity? The antibody testing claimed to indicate HIV has proven - well let's say problematic as to true proof of HIV exposure. Population with very high rates of Measles vaccination and antibody counts suffered measles somewhat as prevalent as unvaccinated or those with low antibody counts
An idea popped into my mind as I read this article. I don't fully understand many things I read, so it's possible this idea is very dumb, but here it is: What if the virus leaked several months before October 2019, but it did not have the mutations to allow it to spread? Government authorities across the world might have agreed to monitor the virus for mutations that increase spread while preparing for the worst by the wargaming the handling of a pandemic, organizing the media for censorship and propaganda, and so on. Then later in 2019 with the B.1 mutation in Italy it became clear that the virus leak that had been festering for months was now becoming a pandemic and would need to become public. This would create the illusion that government leaders had foreknowledge of the pandemic due to some conspiracy when in fact they were quietly monitoring a leaked virus while prudently preparing for the possibility of a dangerous variant in the future.
Kids and teens have strong *innate* immune systems which eliminate common viruses without engaging the machinery of the B and T memory apparatus, right? At least, that's what I've been gleaning from Geert over the past 2 years...
Even in 2020 the circumstantial evidence against the Wuhan Institute of Virology and other biolabs in Wuhan was compelling and as close to conclusive as circumstantial evidence can get.
The most damning evidence against China being the origin of SARS-CoV-2 is the documented stripping of medical supplies and PPE from Australia before the pandemic spread. That was quite the scandal in Australia at the time and well documented by the Australian media.
But from the outset the evidences of Wuhan's involvement in the emergence of SARS-CoV-2 have always accumulated, with very little if any of the evidences ever needing retraction. What was true in 2020 is still true in 2022. Laboratory origins and a bioweapon hypothesis were already attracting significant attention in certain alt-media circles.
What is somewhat disappointing is how the newer lab origin theories seem to just discard the prior evidences in order to make that narrative fit. The evidence against Wuhan remains very much a part of the record and should not be forgotten..
These later studies merely add the already overwhelming circumstantial case against a bioweapon or Lab Origin theory.
Great article. Interesting that it popped up in CA and Italy, but not surprising. I guess I would be interested to know if there were any cases namely in NC (near EcoHealth) or NY (another big hub for international crossover), or in the military, primarily after the Military Games... the armed forces probably have good medical records of anyone getting sick afterwards and/or blood samples..
We’re in England. Think we had covid Nov/Dec’19 - caught from contact at Gatwick Airport - they, and the 3 of us that caught it, didn’t catch delta off family member 18 months later but did catch omicron Dec ‘21. One is blood donor and donated 6 weeks prior to and 6 weeks after suspected infection ( and 3 monthly since). They donated convalescent plasma in May’20 and told antibodies too low to be useful ( defined as less than 6). I wrote to haematologist ( I’m a retired GP) and asked if they could assess for covid antibodies in all pre and post donations - they replied ‘not my job’. I tried to prove it was here earlier but was powerless.
More evidence of lab origin:
• Italy: “The earliest sample with evidence of SARS-CoV-2 RNA was from September 12, 2019.”
• In Oct 2019 the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation co-hosted “Event 201” , in which 15 global business, government, and public health leaders took part in a simulation exercise based on responding to an international “coronavirus” pandemic. The first report of COVID-19 occurred in Nov 2019.
• In many cities (Barcelona , Buenos Aires , Florianopolis , Milan , etc.) COVID-19 was detected in sewage waters at least one month prior to the alleged Dec 2020 wet market spread, but not before Nov 2020, yet it is a proxy of about 2 weeks earlier than public PCR-case statistics.
This is an excerpt of my 2000 papers research: http://bit.ly/research2000
Check the footnotes there. If you discover more, please write so I complete it. f.nazar at gmail
You might be interested in my latest research:
7 COVID genocides:
https://youtu.be/SOIs42o5AI8?t=30585
https://scientificprogress.substack.com/p/the-plan-revealed
https://scientificprogress.substack.com/p/satattack
https://scientificprogress.substack.com/p/killing-me-softly-with-green-songs
https://scientificprogress.substack.com/p/the-threat-of-the-international-plandemic
https://scientificprogress.substack.com/p/water-poisoning-they-drink-perrier
https://scientificprogress.substack.com/p/the-2020-american-coup
https://scientificprogress.substack.com/p/will-tedros-ever-go-to-jail
https://scientificprogress.substack.com/p/the-myocarditis-mammoth-in-the-er
https://scientificprogress.substack.com/p/david-rockefeller-illuminati
One very odd thing about this debacle has been that knowledge of novelty would have given governments an out for getting everything totally wrong about virulence, mode of spread, effectiveness of restrictions, lack of any prior immunity and so on.
At any time they could have said: sorry folks about all that, we actually knew it was novel but couldn’t tell you all as there would have been mass panic, and because it was novel we had to assume no immunity, and limit spread etc.
Now we know that notwithstanding the novelty our immune systems can cope it’s all over guys!! Let’s celebrate!
They could have sold that, but instead chose to dismantle society, which suggests there really was another agenda.
Excellent work. Some solid analysis
How certain are you that the RT-PCR that Kari Mullis stated strongly will not, can not identify, ie detect, a specific viral component, it simply amplifies everything put into the process? Also what about Cycle thresholds, the Ct values that are mostly never mentioned and yet can be so critical to what the PCR makes 'visible'. to the observer?
Antibodies have been shown to be a very poor indicator of immunity and without clear clinical evidence is it possible to say with certain ty that any antibody believed related to SARS-Cov-2 is specific to only that entity? The antibody testing claimed to indicate HIV has proven - well let's say problematic as to true proof of HIV exposure. Population with very high rates of Measles vaccination and antibody counts suffered measles somewhat as prevalent as unvaccinated or those with low antibody counts
An idea popped into my mind as I read this article. I don't fully understand many things I read, so it's possible this idea is very dumb, but here it is: What if the virus leaked several months before October 2019, but it did not have the mutations to allow it to spread? Government authorities across the world might have agreed to monitor the virus for mutations that increase spread while preparing for the worst by the wargaming the handling of a pandemic, organizing the media for censorship and propaganda, and so on. Then later in 2019 with the B.1 mutation in Italy it became clear that the virus leak that had been festering for months was now becoming a pandemic and would need to become public. This would create the illusion that government leaders had foreknowledge of the pandemic due to some conspiracy when in fact they were quietly monitoring a leaked virus while prudently preparing for the possibility of a dangerous variant in the future.
"Kids and teens ... had no antibodies"...
Kids and teens have strong *innate* immune systems which eliminate common viruses without engaging the machinery of the B and T memory apparatus, right? At least, that's what I've been gleaning from Geert over the past 2 years...
Even in 2020 the circumstantial evidence against the Wuhan Institute of Virology and other biolabs in Wuhan was compelling and as close to conclusive as circumstantial evidence can get.
https://newsletter.allfactsmatter.us/p/ccpvirus-yes-it-is-bioweaponhtml
The most damning evidence against China being the origin of SARS-CoV-2 is the documented stripping of medical supplies and PPE from Australia before the pandemic spread. That was quite the scandal in Australia at the time and well documented by the Australian media.
But from the outset the evidences of Wuhan's involvement in the emergence of SARS-CoV-2 have always accumulated, with very little if any of the evidences ever needing retraction. What was true in 2020 is still true in 2022. Laboratory origins and a bioweapon hypothesis were already attracting significant attention in certain alt-media circles.
https://newsletter.allfactsmatter.us/p/covid-19-as-a-bioweapon
What is somewhat disappointing is how the newer lab origin theories seem to just discard the prior evidences in order to make that narrative fit. The evidence against Wuhan remains very much a part of the record and should not be forgotten..
These later studies merely add the already overwhelming circumstantial case against a bioweapon or Lab Origin theory.
Great article. Interesting that it popped up in CA and Italy, but not surprising. I guess I would be interested to know if there were any cases namely in NC (near EcoHealth) or NY (another big hub for international crossover), or in the military, primarily after the Military Games... the armed forces probably have good medical records of anyone getting sick afterwards and/or blood samples..
Can’t circulate a fake virus that does not exist.