I find this arena all very interesting, but at the same time I feel like it's a lot of dead ends and conjecture. We do have to remember that pharmaceutical and biotech companies will patent anything under the sun. Also, we would need to address the sequence not being divisible by 3 and so is the entire sequence an insertion, or is only a fragment of it. And that's more of a superficial take. This type of stuff requires a lot more investigation and more conclusive evidence.
I'm a bit concerned that people may be more focused on starting with a lead and then finding evidence to validate it, rather than looking for information and seeing how they fit together. All of us are rightly concerned about the origins of COVID as well as how safe these vaccines are, but I also feel like this will eventually lead people down routes that lead nowhere.
We should not be so quick to evoke "because Moderna" or "because the Great Reset" for anything that seems out of line. We all need sensible ideas, especially when the environment is willing to find any way to attack dissenters or those who may stray from the mainstream narrative.
Also, thank you for adding my post! It was heavily truncated and there's so much more I could ramble on about but it was already quite excessive. I hope several people weigh in and provide their own opinions!
We're saying the right things, but we're not saying them to the right people, or not the right way. Pockets of resistance on substack won't win the war. Rational arguments aren't working. Malone's March on DC didn't make any difference. Do we need to change our tactics, or head for the hills?? Maybe if we get the right people in congress in january they can end the madness. Maybe litigation will work. If that doesn't work, expect hard times ahead.
Feb 25, 2022·edited Feb 25, 2022Liked by Brian Mowrey
From what I could see, Moderna went patent mad when they got some cash injections and registered anything and everything.
Patent trolls make money without making any products, and Moderna hadn't made a viable product at the time of the patent registrations, so it made sense right?
It did look very suss though, and I can imagine given the tenor of the times, that finding boogie men is easy to do / believe in.
I find this arena all very interesting, but at the same time I feel like it's a lot of dead ends and conjecture. We do have to remember that pharmaceutical and biotech companies will patent anything under the sun. Also, we would need to address the sequence not being divisible by 3 and so is the entire sequence an insertion, or is only a fragment of it. And that's more of a superficial take. This type of stuff requires a lot more investigation and more conclusive evidence.
I'm a bit concerned that people may be more focused on starting with a lead and then finding evidence to validate it, rather than looking for information and seeing how they fit together. All of us are rightly concerned about the origins of COVID as well as how safe these vaccines are, but I also feel like this will eventually lead people down routes that lead nowhere.
We should not be so quick to evoke "because Moderna" or "because the Great Reset" for anything that seems out of line. We all need sensible ideas, especially when the environment is willing to find any way to attack dissenters or those who may stray from the mainstream narrative.
Also, thank you for adding my post! It was heavily truncated and there's so much more I could ramble on about but it was already quite excessive. I hope several people weigh in and provide their own opinions!
We're saying the right things, but we're not saying them to the right people, or not the right way. Pockets of resistance on substack won't win the war. Rational arguments aren't working. Malone's March on DC didn't make any difference. Do we need to change our tactics, or head for the hills?? Maybe if we get the right people in congress in january they can end the madness. Maybe litigation will work. If that doesn't work, expect hard times ahead.
Well, I was going to say exactly the same thing as Igor, so I won't.
Hold on before dismissing it.
The moderna sequence is not in some forsaken and random place on the Sars-Cov-2 genome amidst piles of genomic rubbish.
Quite the opposite, that sequence occupies the most important site -- around and including the "furin cleavage site".
The damage caused by the MSH3 mutation is similar to the damage caused by spike protein entering cell nuclei.
I wrote three substack posts about it. This information does not lead to certain conclusions, but it does raise important questions.
From what I could see, Moderna went patent mad when they got some cash injections and registered anything and everything.
Patent trolls make money without making any products, and Moderna hadn't made a viable product at the time of the patent registrations, so it made sense right?
It did look very suss though, and I can imagine given the tenor of the times, that finding boogie men is easy to do / believe in.