You know, the question that bugs me is: what did Fauci know, when NIH designed a vaccine based on unchanged (minus proline substitutions of FCS) spikes of a *potential* bioweapon?
Charles Rixey mentions you a few times in this chat with Kevin McCairn, and wants your opinion on a few things. Last mention was around -32 to -25 minutes before the end. Sorry, didn’t notice time of earlier mentions. The whole stream is very glitchy until the last half hour.
It is interesting that both of the current SARS-CoV-2 RGS systems used BsaI and BsmBI, and none of the genomes that the ReCCA is constructed from can be cloned with the two current RGS systems……
refreshing to get feedback that doesn't circle around a preformed opinion.
FYI: EHA was sampling bat covs in Laos according to some FOIAd mails.
the big issue with seamless cloning is that the PREEMPT proposal indicates that the plan was to test numerous RBD/FCS combinations in each backbone. basically a library screening assay. this requires the 2 BsaI sites flanking the region of interest, here S1. with seamless cloning, one would have to assemble the entire backbone maybe 30 times, absolutely inefficient.
please let me know how if you figure out how to exactly calculate the odds of getting 5 or 3 exactly needed mutations in a 30kb genome when the chance of messing up everything is 20x higher with each of the ~740 synonymous mutations observed. It's a bit like playing lottery where you need to get 5 numbers (for some there are 5 options) out of 45k (90k possible mutations/2 to correct for nonsynonymous ones) with 740 draws, but you must not draw any of ~20 harmful/"lose it all" numbers.
This Flo Debarre person is an absolute loser. It is not possible to "debunk" anything by relying on twitter posts. In fact, posting on twitter is itself strong evidence of extreme incompetence.
'Even if seamless cloning is not in fact “standard,” one might propose it as more rationale in the context of an “intentional release” theory-of-mind.'
I think maybe you meant "rational" rather than "rationale". It changes the meaning of the sentence. Both versions are grammatically correct.
Are you familiar with JJ Couey ( GigaOhm Biological) who I think, if I understand you correctly, has a similar theory?
I will try and explain his hypothesis here as best I understand it, forgive me if I have misunderstood.
He thinks they needed a way to rebadge all the P&I ( pneumonia and influenza) deaths every year into a disease that could be vaccinated against ( to maximise profits) as currently only a small proportion are actually due to influenza per se. He thinks a natural coronavirus ( or one tinkered with in a lab gain -of -function style ) is not capable of sustaining a pandemic as only a small proportion of the virus swarm is actually replication competent and the mutation rate is too high. In order for it to sustain a pandemic it must be an infectious clone with a much much higher percentage of replication competent ‘viruses’. These infectious clones are built in labs using a set of circularDNA fragments (for a typical coronavirus ) which are joined together ( I can’t comment on all the Bsal etc stuff you talk about as it’s above my pay grade) along with a nasty spike cDNA . This makes a DNA template of the new ‘virus’ which can then be manufactured in its RNA form and released. This would explain simultaneous emergence all over the place with identical strains.
He also thinks that the narrative and counter narrative have been engineered ( himself admitting that as an early member of DRASTIC he fell for it, thinking he was so clever discovering all the gain of function stuff). The two narratives should keep us away from concluding that this was a deliberate infectious clone release. He is very suspicious of Jeffrey Sachs being allowed to spout the ‘counter narrative’ along with the likes of Russell Brand. He’s suspicious of pretty much everybody ( Malone, GVB, Weinstein)!
He was a neurolobiologist and he does live streams on twitch.tv which sometimes have an intro several minutes long of Star Trek -y music and memes which might be off-putting. The streams are always 2-3 hours ( you can watch at double speed) and he takes several streams to consolidate his ideas. He recently presented a 10 minute précis of his theory to RFK Jnr, Malone, Nass, Rose, Lawrie but he couldn’t get across his message completely in such a short space of time. Here is a link to a video of him explaining his theory
I don't see why they can't have a library of potential bioweapon candidates from samples taken all over the world. There seem to be a lot of DTRA labs globally. I seem to remember clusters in SE Asia.
It is very clever to make bioweapons while funding similar research in a competitor state to use as a patsy. You would never farm out your actual best candidate virus research to a competitors lab however. I think Daszak's Wuhan lab work was the parallel construction and that is what the CIA recruited him for. I believe Huff says that the recruitment involved the CIA being very interested in the work that was being done with the Wuhan lab. Of note is that Shi Zhengli was an author of a research paper showing HIV-like characteristics of SARS-COV-2 published earlier this year. Why spill the beans about the special characteristics of your own nasty little bioweapon?
Talking up the threat of zoonotic spillover while making weapons from animal samples is also clever narrative preparation. The icing on the cake is that they blame human encroachment on nature and get to push a green message at the same time. Deindustrialize and depopulate or we'll keep releasing bioweapons that we blame on nature!
Of course it’s a giant troll. Because virology is pure FAKE junk science invented by the Khazarian Mafia to poison you with vaccines. The millions that died during the first hoax - the Spanish Flu - were also “masked” with filthy bacteria pneumonia causing face diapers and VAXXED with Rothschild vaccines.
Mercola posted a few days ago the fingerprint was not to leave a fingerprint, which was unto itself a fingerprint. Dude last name begins with B. It was definitely synthetic. Wish I could drill down further, but I am no longer using G1ggle.
You know, the question that bugs me is: what did Fauci know, when NIH designed a vaccine based on unchanged (minus proline substitutions of FCS) spikes of a *potential* bioweapon?
https://youtu.be/4ZW0RoXBERI
Charles Rixey mentions you a few times in this chat with Kevin McCairn, and wants your opinion on a few things. Last mention was around -32 to -25 minutes before the end. Sorry, didn’t notice time of earlier mentions. The whole stream is very glitchy until the last half hour.
It is interesting that both of the current SARS-CoV-2 RGS systems used BsaI and BsmBI, and none of the genomes that the ReCCA is constructed from can be cloned with the two current RGS systems……
really enjoyed reading this.
refreshing to get feedback that doesn't circle around a preformed opinion.
FYI: EHA was sampling bat covs in Laos according to some FOIAd mails.
the big issue with seamless cloning is that the PREEMPT proposal indicates that the plan was to test numerous RBD/FCS combinations in each backbone. basically a library screening assay. this requires the 2 BsaI sites flanking the region of interest, here S1. with seamless cloning, one would have to assemble the entire backbone maybe 30 times, absolutely inefficient.
please let me know how if you figure out how to exactly calculate the odds of getting 5 or 3 exactly needed mutations in a 30kb genome when the chance of messing up everything is 20x higher with each of the ~740 synonymous mutations observed. It's a bit like playing lottery where you need to get 5 numbers (for some there are 5 options) out of 45k (90k possible mutations/2 to correct for nonsynonymous ones) with 740 draws, but you must not draw any of ~20 harmful/"lose it all" numbers.
This Flo Debarre person is an absolute loser. It is not possible to "debunk" anything by relying on twitter posts. In fact, posting on twitter is itself strong evidence of extreme incompetence.
'Even if seamless cloning is not in fact “standard,” one might propose it as more rationale in the context of an “intentional release” theory-of-mind.'
I think maybe you meant "rational" rather than "rationale". It changes the meaning of the sentence. Both versions are grammatically correct.
Are you familiar with JJ Couey ( GigaOhm Biological) who I think, if I understand you correctly, has a similar theory?
I will try and explain his hypothesis here as best I understand it, forgive me if I have misunderstood.
He thinks they needed a way to rebadge all the P&I ( pneumonia and influenza) deaths every year into a disease that could be vaccinated against ( to maximise profits) as currently only a small proportion are actually due to influenza per se. He thinks a natural coronavirus ( or one tinkered with in a lab gain -of -function style ) is not capable of sustaining a pandemic as only a small proportion of the virus swarm is actually replication competent and the mutation rate is too high. In order for it to sustain a pandemic it must be an infectious clone with a much much higher percentage of replication competent ‘viruses’. These infectious clones are built in labs using a set of circularDNA fragments (for a typical coronavirus ) which are joined together ( I can’t comment on all the Bsal etc stuff you talk about as it’s above my pay grade) along with a nasty spike cDNA . This makes a DNA template of the new ‘virus’ which can then be manufactured in its RNA form and released. This would explain simultaneous emergence all over the place with identical strains.
He also thinks that the narrative and counter narrative have been engineered ( himself admitting that as an early member of DRASTIC he fell for it, thinking he was so clever discovering all the gain of function stuff). The two narratives should keep us away from concluding that this was a deliberate infectious clone release. He is very suspicious of Jeffrey Sachs being allowed to spout the ‘counter narrative’ along with the likes of Russell Brand. He’s suspicious of pretty much everybody ( Malone, GVB, Weinstein)!
He was a neurolobiologist and he does live streams on twitch.tv which sometimes have an intro several minutes long of Star Trek -y music and memes which might be off-putting. The streams are always 2-3 hours ( you can watch at double speed) and he takes several streams to consolidate his ideas. He recently presented a 10 minute précis of his theory to RFK Jnr, Malone, Nass, Rose, Lawrie but he couldn’t get across his message completely in such a short space of time. Here is a link to a video of him explaining his theory
https://www.twitch.tv/videos/1640932656
Next is a link to another substacker who has collected lots of evidence stories for earlier spread ( Sept’19 Europe and USA)
https://billricejr.substack.com/p/the-dog-that-didnt-bark
The FCS is the smoking gun, not the restriction sites. Like 9/11 and JFK there will never be an honest investigation.
The FCS is the smoking gun, not the restriction sites. Like 9/11 and JFK there will never be an honest investigation.
I don't see why they can't have a library of potential bioweapon candidates from samples taken all over the world. There seem to be a lot of DTRA labs globally. I seem to remember clusters in SE Asia.
It is very clever to make bioweapons while funding similar research in a competitor state to use as a patsy. You would never farm out your actual best candidate virus research to a competitors lab however. I think Daszak's Wuhan lab work was the parallel construction and that is what the CIA recruited him for. I believe Huff says that the recruitment involved the CIA being very interested in the work that was being done with the Wuhan lab. Of note is that Shi Zhengli was an author of a research paper showing HIV-like characteristics of SARS-COV-2 published earlier this year. Why spill the beans about the special characteristics of your own nasty little bioweapon?
Talking up the threat of zoonotic spillover while making weapons from animal samples is also clever narrative preparation. The icing on the cake is that they blame human encroachment on nature and get to push a green message at the same time. Deindustrialize and depopulate or we'll keep releasing bioweapons that we blame on nature!
Of course it’s a giant troll. Because virology is pure FAKE junk science invented by the Khazarian Mafia to poison you with vaccines. The millions that died during the first hoax - the Spanish Flu - were also “masked” with filthy bacteria pneumonia causing face diapers and VAXXED with Rothschild vaccines.
PROVE ME WRONG
I’m sending this around today: https://reason.com/volokh/2022/11/07/november-7-as-victims-of-communism-day-2022/
Mercola posted a few days ago the fingerprint was not to leave a fingerprint, which was unto itself a fingerprint. Dude last name begins with B. It was definitely synthetic. Wish I could drill down further, but I am no longer using G1ggle.