I haven't followed Kirsch much since July, though I've been meaning to check his sub. So my now very out-of-date impression is that I like that he trusts his gut, but he is slow to revise when needed (the 82% miscarriage and the R00-R99 errors). His anecdotes on "how to save the world" were what really stepped up my research efforts, so he's indirectly responsible for this sub - but that doesn't have a lot to do with what I think of him. And Rose I only know from the AEs paper.
In general I do get the impression that the eccentric universe of Pandemic Resisters is 90% false flag on a given day, if that is what you're driving at. But the real figure is probably much lower; people are just eccentric.
That's a cool paper. I'm a bit suspicious of the age difference and small sample. I wonder if, in general, male immunity is supposed to stay at a closer-to-off (anti-inflammatory) state during pregnancy to avoid autoimmune issues in either direction; infection naturally changes that risk calculus.
Obstetricians are realizing Covid 19 patients are at higher risk of pre-eclampsia. I wonder if the data suggests it’s higher in male fetuses, thus that small sample size.
Found it at https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/labs/pmc/articles/PMC8294655/ - I'll be sure to add it to my next visit to the pregnancy risk topic. I've been waiting for another update to the Pregnancy Registry paper, hasn't been one since September.
Thanks for this reporting. I'm just stunned there are so few people that care. People are lining themselves and their kids up for this stuff just on the hopes they can get "back to normal". Drink Mercury! It's Goooood!
“The BMJ report, which breaks the closed-ranks that medicine and journalism have formed in support of the Covid vaccines, backs up impression with detail.” The most important sentence in the essay. That the Gates-owned CDC would approve the injection of innocents regardless of the preponderance of evidence it was wrong was not surprising. That the BMJ would print this was. How long before it’s retracted?
Here I wouldn't bet more than a dollar. Maybe they'll wait until it's on Tucker; that's how far they like to let the truth go before issuing the "fact check" these days...
It's not even business. If it was business, courts would be swamped with lawsuits, which is how we keep all other businesses honest. This is corruption, reasonable if the objective is to get quick fixes for high risk infections. The failure this time wasn't Pfizer corruption, but corruption of the approvers -- FDA.
The next level up is the corruption of politics -- if the covid vaccine manufacturers did not have liability from injury, they would have vast numbers of suits right now, and they would be losing billions from them.
Good article as always. Out of curiosity, what do you think of Steve Kirsch and Jessica Rose?
I haven't followed Kirsch much since July, though I've been meaning to check his sub. So my now very out-of-date impression is that I like that he trusts his gut, but he is slow to revise when needed (the 82% miscarriage and the R00-R99 errors). His anecdotes on "how to save the world" were what really stepped up my research efforts, so he's indirectly responsible for this sub - but that doesn't have a lot to do with what I think of him. And Rose I only know from the AEs paper.
In general I do get the impression that the eccentric universe of Pandemic Resisters is 90% false flag on a given day, if that is what you're driving at. But the real figure is probably much lower; people are just eccentric.
http://sm1.multiview.com/t/gcH1AAhbaBPWK2EcQKDGqCLRuIjaBUaBQKH7aaaaBUaBQYC0Cyaa?m=8_uDzB~amp;W=wc1VsTFt~25Btnfhbs.Vvf~amp;s=4n~amp;q=
https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/scitranslmed.abi7428
That's a cool paper. I'm a bit suspicious of the age difference and small sample. I wonder if, in general, male immunity is supposed to stay at a closer-to-off (anti-inflammatory) state during pregnancy to avoid autoimmune issues in either direction; infection naturally changes that risk calculus.
Obstetricians are realizing Covid 19 patients are at higher risk of pre-eclampsia. I wonder if the data suggests it’s higher in male fetuses, thus that small sample size.
Found it at https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/labs/pmc/articles/PMC8294655/ - I'll be sure to add it to my next visit to the pregnancy risk topic. I've been waiting for another update to the Pregnancy Registry paper, hasn't been one since September.
There is a new gene discovery why some people die respiratory issues from Covid … published in Nature I believe. Thus May help explain athlete issue .
Do you have a link?
Thanks 😊
It wouldn’t copy and paste, sorry . The article is in AJOG August 21 Dr. Romero is co author.
Thanks for this reporting. I'm just stunned there are so few people that care. People are lining themselves and their kids up for this stuff just on the hopes they can get "back to normal". Drink Mercury! It's Goooood!
"Got mRNA?"
“The BMJ report, which breaks the closed-ranks that medicine and journalism have formed in support of the Covid vaccines, backs up impression with detail.” The most important sentence in the essay. That the Gates-owned CDC would approve the injection of innocents regardless of the preponderance of evidence it was wrong was not surprising. That the BMJ would print this was. How long before it’s retracted?
Here I wouldn't bet more than a dollar. Maybe they'll wait until it's on Tucker; that's how far they like to let the truth go before issuing the "fact check" these days...
Words fail me. And now the CDC is pushing this mess onto children as young as 5.
"Move fast and break things®️"
“it's just business nothing personal...”
It's not even business. If it was business, courts would be swamped with lawsuits, which is how we keep all other businesses honest. This is corruption, reasonable if the objective is to get quick fixes for high risk infections. The failure this time wasn't Pfizer corruption, but corruption of the approvers -- FDA.
Yes, the FDA was captured by pharma long ago.
The next level up is the corruption of politics -- if the covid vaccine manufacturers did not have liability from injury, they would have vast numbers of suits right now, and they would be losing billions from them.
I understand the manufacturers have no liability, but is that true outside the U.S.? Could they potentially be sued in other countries?
True in Japan.
Seems like they made sure the rollout was preceded by government guarantee of protection wherever they went https://www.globalresearch.ca/pfizer-calling-shots-jab-kids/5760381