23 Comments

I became a new subscriber to your work. Love your play with words and your somewhat different point of view. By the way, thought you may like a book which knows quite a thing or two about what a different point of view really is. It is ''A silent gene theory of evolution'' written by Warwick Collins. I am looking forward to reading your views on cancer and Covid-19-''vaccines''.

Expand full comment

Thank you for the kind words and the exciting recommendation! I have purchased the ebook and look forward to reading.

Expand full comment

Could be somewhat of a missing link. Explains a lot and shows why forcing cells to produce a protein (spike) without a biological history, via un-biological instruction, could be cancer promoting.

The fact that only a few protein structures are used by nature, although countless others would be possible, simply makes sense. Just as our alphabet consists of a certain number of letters that can be combined in countless ways, only those combinations are part of our languages, in the form of words, that are useful for our communication - even if there are countless combinations that are possible but only cause confusion because they have arisen without context, without silent agreement. What sense does it therefore make to produce proteins (spike) for which there is no necessity on the part of life? And what are the consequences of presenting the body with the lie that what is possible in this way is also necessary for life? What sense does it make to form words that no one understands, daz gteeo ethjuistsch fg hjt bbbbbxxklaqqi? Adoutz ffgghh q o nfgschie k k, lapo schusch, ertöö bhgggdfr hj, ghhg bnbvfffg zurtm.

Expand full comment

Yes, that is basically exactly the mechanism I will be proposing. In the normal course of a viral infection, "write nonsense" is automatically followed by lysis / cell destruction - or, the virus enters lysogenic dormancy, which means the "write nonsense" command is turned off. The mRNA script isn't followed by that automatic kill state, so the "write nonsense" command is free to actually be translated into its intrinsic pathogenic results.

Expand full comment

Is 'virus gonna virus' a meme out there in there in the big bad internet or something? You said that in one of your previous posts and I thought it was great! Then Berenson used it as a title for one of his recent posts.

Expand full comment

Yes, it’s a meme that is at least a year old.

Expand full comment

How did humanity survive all these millions of years without fauxi? The recent vax fetish is tolerated only because we've been trained to expect zero risk existence. They're not mad because they're forced to vax, they're mad because the vax doesn't work. They're anxious for the next path to salvation.

Expand full comment

Modern humanity mostly got by by forgetting risk, which is easy if the news shuts up about it. But prior cultures practiced risk acceptance - Roman “death masks,” etc. - which is the only way to move forward even with daily reminders of the risk. Our lack of such a practice is probably why we are susceptible to being brainwashed...

Expand full comment

Everybody tries. Some do it better than others.

Expand full comment

Oh yeah and my first post got edited about 17 times post-pub, wow. I know what you mean, and my content is only opining vs clinical or medical or scientific.

Expand full comment

Yeah, I basically do all my editing post-publication. It's a "bad habit" in that it contradicts what I would rather do; but on the other hand it leads to higher efficiency since post-"publish" is the only time when I am 100% focused on the topic at hand.

Expand full comment

I prefer to edit in response to comments. That leaves a sort of record of what changed, and why. Pursuit of perfection for its own sake is an endless (and usually thankless) task.

Expand full comment

Right, all my substantial edits are noted in "Updates to" posts and inlaid correction notices. But the rest is not pursuit of perfection - its just finishing the work that should have taken place before posting. Too bad there's no way to place the thing online and only delay the email; I would use it.

Expand full comment

I am looking forward to your “Covid vaccine-induced cancer” theory post - I included the premise in a song I rewrote for my own most recent post.

Expand full comment

I live in Japan and have a young child in public school here. The flu shot is among those required for students attending school. I do not for how long this has been the case. It is also long been customary for a large portion of the population to wear face masks against flu. Yet, despite wide usage of flu vaccines and masks, the flu still makes its rounds each year.

Expand full comment

It's very hard to track the updates to child vaccination requirements over the last 30 years - because there have been so many of them.

When I grew up, the flu was not even something that kids had any reason to think about. The vaccine "created" the fear (by creating a financial incentive for promoting the fear).

Expand full comment

Similar with me. Got the flu every year. Spent a few days at home on the couch with pillow, blanket and lots of Canada Dry Ginger Ale watching cartoons. Had soup a lot during these few days and back to school. Only medication was OTC.

BRW, when did flu shots debut? I thought they were a much more recent vaccine?

Expand full comment

I cannot offer an authoritative answer. My impression is that it arrived in 2003 and then there was a theatrical "shortage" the very next year to trick everyone into thinking that everyone else had already been getting it, and FOMO took over from there (https://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=4073505)

Expand full comment

That is about the time I thought they came out too. Looking at my vaccination card from my time in the navy, I received a flu shot in Jan. 1998. I was to learn it existed this early and that I did not remember/know that I got the flu shot. Not really important, just curious.

Expand full comment

Military gives lots of shots to their captive lab rats. I remember one they gave us time to time with a large syringe in the glutes, called gamma globulin, or "gg." They never explained to me why, "bend over" was sufficient.

Expand full comment

Interesting - my mother, who was in the navy, attests that she always got the flu shot. She was astonished to hear my assurance that seemingly nothing on the internet supports the existence of a vaccine for widespread use before 2003 (aside from the recalled vaccine in the 70s). Google n-gram supports an "emergence" either in 2003 or only just before it https://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=flu+vaccine&year_start=1800&year_end=2019&corpus=26&smoothing=3&direct_url=t1%3B%2Cflu%20vaccine%3B%2Cc0#t1%3B%2Cflu%20vaccine%3B%2Cc0

Expand full comment

Online searches are good only for information from after a certain when things were originally published for online. Everything before that date requires someone to transcribe the information into a digital format and upload it. Most are too busy publishing tiger current work to go back and redo their past prep line work. That may account for this.

Additionally, service members, art least naval personnel, seem to have been used as human Guinea pigs for a long time. A shipmate of mine was trying to get compensation for his late father who died of several bizarre cancers after being ordered off his ship to go stand in the desert and watch nuclear blasts. Perhaps your mother and I were unwitting test subjects for the flu shot. My shot record shows “6 Jan 98. Influenza .5cc”. Under the headings of “Date, Vaccine, Dose”

Expand full comment