A science fiction author released a Zombie Apocalypse novel (or series) that featured a virus as the method of zombification.
Perhaps he extended the idea of T. gondii (not a virus) which seems to be able to confuse mice and can have symptoms like confusion and loss of coordination. His evil virus had two 'payloads.' One was some sort of normal virus that was highly infectious but the second was a payload that attacked some part (unspecified) of the brain and zombified the infected. Perhaps the second payload was supposed to further help the spread of the virus.
The notion of such a complex virus, however, is pretty stupid as almost everything not needed for the primary purpose (replication and transmission) is going to degrade and/or be dropped. Secondly, having tropism that can attack epithelial cells as well as specific neurons is pretty complex. Complexity is bad for viruses.
It turns out that D3 is needed even for the innate immune system. Who knew? Well, it seems that Fauci did. And a large number of people in the West (and possibly elsewhere) are deficient or insufficient.
This tends to muddy the waters around the narrative "vaccine evil"! It may simply be "vaccine useless but it does damage some people and the real problem is that various winter viruses are killing people because their immune systems are not working".
Perhaps there are different things going on here during different seasons.
Off topic, but whoa. Has Ron Unz become an Anti-Vaxxer? He has section titles like "The Surprising Flaws in Vaccine Safety Testing". I have yet to read it so I cannot be sure ... but he refers to Turtles All The Way Down.
'The only clinical benefit recorded in the Pfizer C4591001 study published in the NEJM on the 10th Dec 2020 was: "a 95% reduction in the chance of testing positive for COVID by a PCR test conducted at Pfizer's laboratory in Pearl River"'
The codon optimization performed by Pfizer and Moderna is claimed by some to allow them to unblind the samples by testing to see if the samples have their specific mRNA in them and then subject them to different thresholds in the RT-PCR tests.
However, what if those are really designed to allow them to claim their share of the bounty for killing people? Did you ever think of that?
Igor is starting to figure out the consequences of a vaccine that is ineffective. Maybe that excess mortality is caused by SARS-CoV-2 after all because the vaccine Does. Not. Work.
I need to read the article in more depth, however.
Here I found a fun thread about escaped lab monkeys for you, Brian. I just wanted to point out that Ft. Derrick is to the south of PA, and maybe where these monkeys were headed.
Well, I must admit that I jumped the shark with my post. This is what happens when you do late night Substacking!
But seriously, the sensationalist format of the videos certainly got the best of me. Looking back there were certainly pieces that didn't make sense such as what you posted above- how does someone in his position know about all of these facts?
I guess, in a strange sense, he probably was trying to show off to his date?
I will probably make a quick post linking to this article and explaining my oopsie.
Your comments on GOF are actually something I've had questions about, hence my comments about whether an immunocompromised patient with persistent SARS-COV2 infections would be considered a GOF experiment. The term is used rather broadly, so either we continue to use it broadly and dilute the meaning of the term, or we use it in a more...directed manner.
Am not caught up, but I logged in to facebook on my damn laptop to copy & paste this post I did to get this to a level of public thinking. I just ran it by a doctor who is not my mom and she just said it's dense... and I think it is dense in the same way you can be--it's like how a virus is this absent thing you're keeping tracking of, so I'll be reading one of your posts and i'll mentally attribute "joke" but... like i don't get it dude! haha. so if you have any reactions on the level of communicating i'd be curious to hear. or on the level of St. Thomas Francis Jr.:
"I guess I'm in an anti-Deleuzean period, which... grant me that, he co-authored Anti-Oedipus, which I do buy the line is the most Oedipal thing one can do --I'm like why didn't I think of that, it's baldingly obvious in the same way tolerance may be a factor if you keep injecting people with something that is meant to severely effect their system--
I might as well outright say if you are on the bleeding edge of the mainstream account of vaccines, you might run into a pushback manifested as the Original Antigenic Sin theory... this was actually called this and the whole COVID thing is like a weird re-telling of modernism, structural linguistics and psychoanalysis--it's just too on-the-nose if you spend your life absorbing stuff no one you know cares about and makes itself out to be inscrutable but only as an effect academic elitism as far as I can tell...
ANYWAY, so as far as I can tell Original Antigenic Sin, was sort of an ironic/not-ironic puritanically neurotic take on viruses, these things we can infer through different markers, but we don't outright see, that this guy, I think it was Thomas Francis Jr, very saintly name, came up with because he thought he could cash-in on a universal flu vaccine, so he saw some stuff that made him think one's first encounter with influenza imprints itself in the reaction so thereafter the body's response specifically targets that one particular... expression, I don't know exactly what he was working with now that I think about, this was in the 60s so long before PCR, but they could nail down some specific difference enough so this guy could come up with a theory of why, I'm still a bit iffy on this actually, his universal vaccine is totally necessary from the get-go. I have trouble attributing this as blatantly alarmist and self-serving logic, but it's on the table and to some degree I think it may accord with reality. I think I can get my mind to be like a brain that's almost the size of the universe, in which thoughts can exist like the albino cat I see in my backyard everyday just existing and doing it's thing until otherwise.
So there was a Wall Street Journal editorial, that I think was wrote to alarm people about the implications of vaccines and Original Antigenic Sin. And I think cellular plasticity or whatever, is beyond this weird biblical/but-not logic. In my opinion one should not be alarmed, but consider that there may be some tolerance effect to injecting themselves with a virus reaction on an accelerated basis. In the words of Deleuze, if you are caught in another's dream you're f-cked.
Oh yeah, but my point is I probably am Deleuzian, I was born this way, but what is deleuze but another (post) modern approximation of indigenous existence. So that's where I'm at."
"Directed evolution" another moronic phrase. If "evolution" means anything at all, of course it's directed. Random mutation acted on by natural selection... Selection=direction. Further abuse of the English language.
-"Well, let's see, ah yes, recently, I was drilling holes in a lot of monkey heads and putting stuff in it, and waited to see whether it made them miserable. It's really interesting."
Now that sounds like a well-adjusted, healthy psyche right there. The first choice when I'd be looking for someone to watch over my children (if I had any) while I'm absent.
Freemasons are very fond of Malthus and Darwin. Historically, whererever there’s population apocalypticists, anti-natalism, eugenics, sterilization and depopulation, we’d find freemasonic money, like bees to honey:
In 1913, eugeni-racist Margaret Sanger gave a conference at a UK freemasonic Fabian Society, where she met eugenicist (and later pro-Nazi) Marie Stopes, who advocated sterilization of non-whites and the poor, and helped her writing a chapter on contraception.
In 1917, Binnie Dunlop, secretary of the freemasonic Malthusian League, introduced her to Humphrey Verdon Roe, her future husband, who’d publish her after all editors had refused to.
In 1921, Marie Stopes opened the first birth control facility in the UK
Stopes, a racist and an anti-Semite, campaigned for selective breeding to achieve racial purity, a passion she shared with Adolf Hitler in adoring letters and poems that she sent the leader of the Third Reich.
Stopes also attended the Nazi congress on population science in Berlin in 1935, while calling for the “compulsory sterilization of the diseased, drunkards, or simply those of bad character.” Stopes acted on her appalling theories by concentrating her abortion clinics in poor areas so as to reduce the birth rate of the lower classes.
Stopes left most of her estate to the Eugenics Society, an organization that shared her passion for racial purity and still exists today under the new name The Galton Institute. The society has included members such as Charles Galton Darwin (grandson of the evolutionist), Julian Huxley and Margaret Sanger.
In the 1930s John D. Rockefeller, exported eugenics from Britain to Germany funding the Kaiser Wilhelm Institute, a pillar of the Nazi super race.
In 1947 the head of the Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research and Nobel Prize (1960) immunologist Sir Macfarlane Burnet advised the Australian government to develop biological and chemical weapons to target food crops and spread infectious diseases against Indonesia and other “overpopulated” countries of South-East Asia.
In the 1950s, the Rockefellers funded population-control and abortion groups, including The Eugenics Society, renamed the Society for the Study of Social Biology.
In the 1960s, the Eugenics Society of England adopted “crypto-eugenics”, i.e. instruments falsely not labelled as eugenics, such as population control, population stabilization and family planning of whoever they consider the un-fittest to be terminated. Rockefeller funded the International Planned Parenthood Federation, addressed for 12 years in the Eugenics Society. For instance, most PP abortuaries in the USA are located in African American and Latino neighbourhoods.
In 1969, a Department of State telegram, reported the support of John D. Rockefeller III and others, for the appointment of Rafael Salas of the Philippines as senior officer to co-ordinate and administer the UN population program, because of his color and Catholic religion (to dupe such groups).1
In 1974 Bilderberger Henry Kissinger wrote the National Security Memorandum 200, a plan to use food scarcity and family planning, defined as health services (in spite of including abortion, abortifacients wrongly called contraception and lethal contraceptives), as weapons (truly WMD) in order to achieve population reduction in lesser-developed countries (LDC). Also, it planned exchanging aid food and funds for mandatory population control through the United Nations Fund for Population Activities (UNFPA), “avoiding the danger that some LDC leaders will see developed-country pressures for family planning as a form of economic or racial imperialism”. 2
In 1977 White House science advisor John P. Holdren’s textbook Ecoscience called for a global dictatorship to enforce depopulation, even with forced sterilization.
In 1988, Prince Phillipe RIP, the queen’s consort, who was a freemason, like most of the UK royals, said: “In the event that I am reincarnated, I would like to return as a deadly virus, to contribute something to solving overpopulation.” 3
In 2006, Dr. Erik Pianka advocated in a conference the need to exterminate 90% of the world’s population, “no better than bacteria!”, through sterilization and an airborne virus (avian flu, ebola). Got a standing ovation.4
5 May 2009, David Rockefeller Jr hosted a secretive meeting with Gorge Soros, Bill Gates, Warren Buffet, Michael Bloomberg, Ted Turner and Oprah Winfrey, calling themselves “The Good Club”, to discuss depopulation plans. “Why all the secrecy? They wanted to speak rich to rich without worrying anything they said would end up in the newspapers, painting them as an alternative world government.” 5
In 2012, as a result from that meeting, CNN mogul Ted Turner, a freemason Bilderberger, wanted a population reduction of 95% (360 million left out of 7 billion) through a global 100 year one child policy (although he had 5 children and 2 million acres), due to an alleged global warming of 8° in 40 years (although he has private jets).6
Yet, even before that, less than one year after “The Good Club” meeting:
In 2010, Bill Gates said in a TED talk promoting decarbonisation by population culling as a solution to the weather change fake crisis: “So you’ve got a thing on the left, CO2, that you want to get to zero, and that’s going to be based on the number of people, the services each person is using on average, the energy, on average, for each service, and the CO2 being put out per unit of energy… The world today has 6.8 billion people. That’s headed up to about 9 billion. Now, if we do a really great job on new vaccines, health care, reproductive health services (i.e. murdering unborn babies through abortion and abortifacients promoted by the Bill&Melinda Gates Foundation), we could lower that by, perhaps 10 or 15 percent”.7
A science fiction author released a Zombie Apocalypse novel (or series) that featured a virus as the method of zombification.
Perhaps he extended the idea of T. gondii (not a virus) which seems to be able to confuse mice and can have symptoms like confusion and loss of coordination. His evil virus had two 'payloads.' One was some sort of normal virus that was highly infectious but the second was a payload that attacked some part (unspecified) of the brain and zombified the infected. Perhaps the second payload was supposed to further help the spread of the virus.
The notion of such a complex virus, however, is pretty stupid as almost everything not needed for the primary purpose (replication and transmission) is going to degrade and/or be dropped. Secondly, having tropism that can attack epithelial cells as well as specific neurons is pretty complex. Complexity is bad for viruses.
Another Off Topic or maybe not.
It turns out that D3 is needed even for the innate immune system. Who knew? Well, it seems that Fauci did. And a large number of people in the West (and possibly elsewhere) are deficient or insufficient.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26433491/
This tends to muddy the waters around the narrative "vaccine evil"! It may simply be "vaccine useless but it does damage some people and the real problem is that various winter viruses are killing people because their immune systems are not working".
Perhaps there are different things going on here during different seasons.
Off topic, but whoa. Has Ron Unz become an Anti-Vaxxer? He has section titles like "The Surprising Flaws in Vaccine Safety Testing". I have yet to read it so I cannot be sure ... but he refers to Turtles All The Way Down.
https://www.unz.com/runz/american-pravda-vaccines-and-the-mystery-of-polio/
Over at Arkmedic in https://arkmedic.substack.com/p/dont-be-arrsey it says:
'The only clinical benefit recorded in the Pfizer C4591001 study published in the NEJM on the 10th Dec 2020 was: "a 95% reduction in the chance of testing positive for COVID by a PCR test conducted at Pfizer's laboratory in Pearl River"'
However, in the Daily Clout Pfizer Documents Analysis Volunteers' Report Ebook (https://www.amazon.com/DailyClout-Documents-Analysis-Volunteers-Reports-ebook/dp/B0BSK6LV5D/ref=sr_1_1) on page 48 it says that the FDA criteria for a confirmed Covid diagnosis was:
A. One of the following symptoms and they list 10 symptoms)
N. Plus: a respiratory specimen in suspected SC2 + by NAAT obtained during symptomatic period +/- four days before.
An NAAT seems to refer to a Nucleic Acid Amplification Test like RT-PCR.
Now, on the surface of it it seems that at least one of the above two claims are incorrect.
I have yet to read the NEJM paper but it is curious that people cannot seem to get these things correct.
I am starting to get the following feeling.
The environment our immune system lives in is complex, so simple explanations are probably wrong. Please prove me wrong.
CONSPIRACY THEORY ALERT!
The codon optimization performed by Pfizer and Moderna is claimed by some to allow them to unblind the samples by testing to see if the samples have their specific mRNA in them and then subject them to different thresholds in the RT-PCR tests.
However, what if those are really designed to allow them to claim their share of the bounty for killing people? Did you ever think of that?
Igor is starting to figure out the consequences of a vaccine that is ineffective. Maybe that excess mortality is caused by SARS-CoV-2 after all because the vaccine Does. Not. Work.
I need to read the article in more depth, however.
https://igorchudov.substack.com/p/is-geerts-prediction-of-a-deadlier
Here I found a fun thread about escaped lab monkeys for you, Brian. I just wanted to point out that Ft. Derrick is to the south of PA, and maybe where these monkeys were headed.
https://twitter.com/TaraBull808/status/1619079682040934400
Wow, what a new concept. So new that the body has been doing it for a long while:
https://www.science.org/content/article/protein-decoys-viruses-may-battle-covid-19-and-more
"Protein decoys for viruses may battle COVID-19 and more
Drugs designed to resemble pathogen’s cellular targets could prevent infection"
Healthy individuals embed sialic acid in their mucus as just one example.
I wonder if anyone has looked to see what other interesting receptor analogs?
This is also pointing out that it's a numbers game. If we can reduce the number of virions that can infect cells, we are winning.
Pfizer clarifies: "We don't always do Gain of Function research but when we do we make hundreds of billions of dollars" or something like that.
Well, I must admit that I jumped the shark with my post. This is what happens when you do late night Substacking!
But seriously, the sensationalist format of the videos certainly got the best of me. Looking back there were certainly pieces that didn't make sense such as what you posted above- how does someone in his position know about all of these facts?
I guess, in a strange sense, he probably was trying to show off to his date?
I will probably make a quick post linking to this article and explaining my oopsie.
Your comments on GOF are actually something I've had questions about, hence my comments about whether an immunocompromised patient with persistent SARS-COV2 infections would be considered a GOF experiment. The term is used rather broadly, so either we continue to use it broadly and dilute the meaning of the term, or we use it in a more...directed manner.
Am not caught up, but I logged in to facebook on my damn laptop to copy & paste this post I did to get this to a level of public thinking. I just ran it by a doctor who is not my mom and she just said it's dense... and I think it is dense in the same way you can be--it's like how a virus is this absent thing you're keeping tracking of, so I'll be reading one of your posts and i'll mentally attribute "joke" but... like i don't get it dude! haha. so if you have any reactions on the level of communicating i'd be curious to hear. or on the level of St. Thomas Francis Jr.:
"I guess I'm in an anti-Deleuzean period, which... grant me that, he co-authored Anti-Oedipus, which I do buy the line is the most Oedipal thing one can do --I'm like why didn't I think of that, it's baldingly obvious in the same way tolerance may be a factor if you keep injecting people with something that is meant to severely effect their system--
I might as well outright say if you are on the bleeding edge of the mainstream account of vaccines, you might run into a pushback manifested as the Original Antigenic Sin theory... this was actually called this and the whole COVID thing is like a weird re-telling of modernism, structural linguistics and psychoanalysis--it's just too on-the-nose if you spend your life absorbing stuff no one you know cares about and makes itself out to be inscrutable but only as an effect academic elitism as far as I can tell...
ANYWAY, so as far as I can tell Original Antigenic Sin, was sort of an ironic/not-ironic puritanically neurotic take on viruses, these things we can infer through different markers, but we don't outright see, that this guy, I think it was Thomas Francis Jr, very saintly name, came up with because he thought he could cash-in on a universal flu vaccine, so he saw some stuff that made him think one's first encounter with influenza imprints itself in the reaction so thereafter the body's response specifically targets that one particular... expression, I don't know exactly what he was working with now that I think about, this was in the 60s so long before PCR, but they could nail down some specific difference enough so this guy could come up with a theory of why, I'm still a bit iffy on this actually, his universal vaccine is totally necessary from the get-go. I have trouble attributing this as blatantly alarmist and self-serving logic, but it's on the table and to some degree I think it may accord with reality. I think I can get my mind to be like a brain that's almost the size of the universe, in which thoughts can exist like the albino cat I see in my backyard everyday just existing and doing it's thing until otherwise.
So there was a Wall Street Journal editorial, that I think was wrote to alarm people about the implications of vaccines and Original Antigenic Sin. And I think cellular plasticity or whatever, is beyond this weird biblical/but-not logic. In my opinion one should not be alarmed, but consider that there may be some tolerance effect to injecting themselves with a virus reaction on an accelerated basis. In the words of Deleuze, if you are caught in another's dream you're f-cked.
Oh yeah, but my point is I probably am Deleuzian, I was born this way, but what is deleuze but another (post) modern approximation of indigenous existence. So that's where I'm at."
"Directed evolution" another moronic phrase. If "evolution" means anything at all, of course it's directed. Random mutation acted on by natural selection... Selection=direction. Further abuse of the English language.
*at the restaurant table, date #1*
"So, what do you actually do at your job?"
-"Well, let's see, ah yes, recently, I was drilling holes in a lot of monkey heads and putting stuff in it, and waited to see whether it made them miserable. It's really interesting."
Now that sounds like a well-adjusted, healthy psyche right there. The first choice when I'd be looking for someone to watch over my children (if I had any) while I'm absent.
Wow! Are you a CIA analyst? You surely have the skills to put the puzzle back together!
I'd like to quote several key parts of it in my book: how should I?
I'm not attacking you but you are missing key pieces which could turn your conclusion upside down.
How can you explain that the same HIV sequence was found in SARS-Cov1 and MERS?:
https://scientificprogress.substack.com/p/the-real-covid-timeline
Would you change your conclusion after reading that?
Are you are denying there's a freemason plot to kill 95%+ of the population?
https://youtu.be/SOIs42o5AI8?t=30585
Freemasons are very fond of Malthus and Darwin. Historically, whererever there’s population apocalypticists, anti-natalism, eugenics, sterilization and depopulation, we’d find freemasonic money, like bees to honey:
In 1913, eugeni-racist Margaret Sanger gave a conference at a UK freemasonic Fabian Society, where she met eugenicist (and later pro-Nazi) Marie Stopes, who advocated sterilization of non-whites and the poor, and helped her writing a chapter on contraception.
In 1917, Binnie Dunlop, secretary of the freemasonic Malthusian League, introduced her to Humphrey Verdon Roe, her future husband, who’d publish her after all editors had refused to.
In 1921, Marie Stopes opened the first birth control facility in the UK
Stopes, a racist and an anti-Semite, campaigned for selective breeding to achieve racial purity, a passion she shared with Adolf Hitler in adoring letters and poems that she sent the leader of the Third Reich.
Stopes also attended the Nazi congress on population science in Berlin in 1935, while calling for the “compulsory sterilization of the diseased, drunkards, or simply those of bad character.” Stopes acted on her appalling theories by concentrating her abortion clinics in poor areas so as to reduce the birth rate of the lower classes.
Stopes left most of her estate to the Eugenics Society, an organization that shared her passion for racial purity and still exists today under the new name The Galton Institute. The society has included members such as Charles Galton Darwin (grandson of the evolutionist), Julian Huxley and Margaret Sanger.
In the 1930s John D. Rockefeller, exported eugenics from Britain to Germany funding the Kaiser Wilhelm Institute, a pillar of the Nazi super race.
In 1947 the head of the Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research and Nobel Prize (1960) immunologist Sir Macfarlane Burnet advised the Australian government to develop biological and chemical weapons to target food crops and spread infectious diseases against Indonesia and other “overpopulated” countries of South-East Asia.
In the 1950s, the Rockefellers funded population-control and abortion groups, including The Eugenics Society, renamed the Society for the Study of Social Biology.
In the 1960s, the Eugenics Society of England adopted “crypto-eugenics”, i.e. instruments falsely not labelled as eugenics, such as population control, population stabilization and family planning of whoever they consider the un-fittest to be terminated. Rockefeller funded the International Planned Parenthood Federation, addressed for 12 years in the Eugenics Society. For instance, most PP abortuaries in the USA are located in African American and Latino neighbourhoods.
In 1969, a Department of State telegram, reported the support of John D. Rockefeller III and others, for the appointment of Rafael Salas of the Philippines as senior officer to co-ordinate and administer the UN population program, because of his color and Catholic religion (to dupe such groups).1
In 1974 Bilderberger Henry Kissinger wrote the National Security Memorandum 200, a plan to use food scarcity and family planning, defined as health services (in spite of including abortion, abortifacients wrongly called contraception and lethal contraceptives), as weapons (truly WMD) in order to achieve population reduction in lesser-developed countries (LDC). Also, it planned exchanging aid food and funds for mandatory population control through the United Nations Fund for Population Activities (UNFPA), “avoiding the danger that some LDC leaders will see developed-country pressures for family planning as a form of economic or racial imperialism”. 2
In 1977 White House science advisor John P. Holdren’s textbook Ecoscience called for a global dictatorship to enforce depopulation, even with forced sterilization.
In 1988, Prince Phillipe RIP, the queen’s consort, who was a freemason, like most of the UK royals, said: “In the event that I am reincarnated, I would like to return as a deadly virus, to contribute something to solving overpopulation.” 3
In 2006, Dr. Erik Pianka advocated in a conference the need to exterminate 90% of the world’s population, “no better than bacteria!”, through sterilization and an airborne virus (avian flu, ebola). Got a standing ovation.4
5 May 2009, David Rockefeller Jr hosted a secretive meeting with Gorge Soros, Bill Gates, Warren Buffet, Michael Bloomberg, Ted Turner and Oprah Winfrey, calling themselves “The Good Club”, to discuss depopulation plans. “Why all the secrecy? They wanted to speak rich to rich without worrying anything they said would end up in the newspapers, painting them as an alternative world government.” 5
In 2012, as a result from that meeting, CNN mogul Ted Turner, a freemason Bilderberger, wanted a population reduction of 95% (360 million left out of 7 billion) through a global 100 year one child policy (although he had 5 children and 2 million acres), due to an alleged global warming of 8° in 40 years (although he has private jets).6
Yet, even before that, less than one year after “The Good Club” meeting:
In 2010, Bill Gates said in a TED talk promoting decarbonisation by population culling as a solution to the weather change fake crisis: “So you’ve got a thing on the left, CO2, that you want to get to zero, and that’s going to be based on the number of people, the services each person is using on average, the energy, on average, for each service, and the CO2 being put out per unit of energy… The world today has 6.8 billion people. That’s headed up to about 9 billion. Now, if we do a really great job on new vaccines, health care, reproductive health services (i.e. murdering unborn babies through abortion and abortifacients promoted by the Bill&Melinda Gates Foundation), we could lower that by, perhaps 10 or 15 percent”.7
This is the full plan:
https://scientificprogress.substack.com/p/the-plan-revealed
If interested in the book subscribe.
Don't worry folks. It will all die down now that YT has banned that video.