Serum IgG4 level predicts COVID-19 related mortality
"Specifically, a concentration of serum IgG4 > 700 mg/dl and an IgG4/IgG1 ratio > 0.05 were associated with a significantly increased mortality at 30-days"
The Borg has responded claiming that it's all fake and ghey because she claimed they were not seeing less effective clearance of the virus and IgG1 levels are similar and are great.
I saw an article (polemical, adversarial, as is necessary) from someone else and thought - hmmm I wonder if... scrolled up 4 emails and there's your email to this post. Yep, as I thought.
I do have H1 and H2 blockers but have never had to use them, nor the horse paste I have.
He also published this:
Immunological Mechanisms Explaining the Role of Vaccines, IgE, Mast Cells, Histamine, Elevating Ferritin, IL-6, D-dimer, VEGF Levels in COVID-19 and Dengue, Potential Treatments Such as Mast Cell Stabilizers, Antihistamines: Predictions and Confirmations
https://rumble.com/v1w6kuq-dr.-sucharit-bhakdi-the-path-to-living-hell.html it isn't the Spike (tho it is bad) It is the mRNA technology itself that shuts down the native immune system leading to ADE and thus inability to defend against CANCER CELLS and other infections and which ALSO creates the autoimmune disruption IgG4 etc. And the methodology the thinking is flawed. Yet they will say, are saying the concept of the xperiment (you and your vaxxed cohors) is successful, yayy! Lets go make MORE mRNA tech jabs for Tetnus, for Measles etc etc etc... and mandate them all. Pretty soon, a dead and dying population - and those NOT dying are having brain damage from vascular clotting and become more tractable and biddable... and less intelligent and able to use their higher logic.
Having been flooded with IgG4 news the last couple of days, I was looking forward to your take on it. I haven't had time to read it yet but I already appreciate it.
The question that arose was how does the S-protein get into the circulatory system in large enough quantity such that it can produce such large clots?
Then I wondered about the papers I have seen that demonstrate the less-than-perfect copy fidelity of the mRNA-based #ClotShots and thought about the possibility that some people are creating S proteins with defective trans-membrane anchors and they slip right through when they try to anchor in the cell membrane prior to the virion forming.
Do we know enough about the packaging of SARS-CoV-2 or other viruses to understand how packaging occurs. I very much doubt there is some sort of viral shepherd that shepherds all the constituent parts to the cell membrane for those viruses that use our own cell membranes as their own membranes. Perhaps the S protein has some sort of affinity for the cell membrane and naturally inserts itself into the cell membrane and then the remaining components are attracted to the trans-membrane anchor tails and some other signal causes the virion to pinch off the cell membrane and form.
But if those anchors are defective the S protein will slip into the intracellular space and if the cells happen to be circulatory epithelial cells they get into the blood stream and form clots.
There is so much noise being made about the IgG4 paper that the CDC, the FDA and all other organs of Government are going to have to do something, like declare that it is anti-Science and witchcraft.
I come from a self employed business background where I am always solving new problems. We often use the synergy of different minds in a group setting to solve problems. Different ideas start building on each other and these individual minds become a "mastermind " where ideas and creativity feed off each other and come up with solutions that one individual could never have come up with on their own. I see similarities in Substack contributors on this topic, feeding off each others ideas and leading to understanding a very complex problem.
For example, in the original article last summer Brian states "Only two time points are shown for this group; my best guess is that “post 2nd” means 14 days, due to the high level of IgG1."
Jessica's article states that "post 2nd" was after 210 days.
This 210 days becomes an important part of the puzzle that Igor expands on. IgG4 growth that occurs months after the boost could be the reason for increasing mortality stats appearing months after the booster instead of occurring immediately after the booster. In effect, creating a delay in the deaths as the IgG4 levels have had a chance to build.
I know Brian was being facetious about being first, but it really isn't about credit for being first. The sharing of ideas by different creative minds is creating the insight into a very complex problem.
Super late response, but who will take over Unglossed now?? I think that random guy I found in the back of an Arby's should do well! I think he used to work at Pfizer (that's how the gag works right?).
Meanwhile, you’re getting mentions. https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2023/01/its_time_to_ask_whether_repeated_mrna_vaccine_shots_weaken_the_immune_response_to_covid19.html
It's very nice attitude in Science, pro-vaxers are't.
Please continue adventure in Science, with us.
What are your thoughts on this paper?
Serum IgG4 level predicts COVID-19 related mortality
"Specifically, a concentration of serum IgG4 > 700 mg/dl and an IgG4/IgG1 ratio > 0.05 were associated with a significantly increased mortality at 30-days"
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8461218/
The Borg has responded claiming that it's all fake and ghey because she claimed they were not seeing less effective clearance of the virus and IgG1 levels are similar and are great.
https://twitter.com/SabiVM/status/1607915944877211651
I saw an article (polemical, adversarial, as is necessary) from someone else and thought - hmmm I wonder if... scrolled up 4 emails and there's your email to this post. Yep, as I thought.
Lemme guess... nothing burger?
This guy is claiming that the deaths are a result of a severe allergic reaction, as far as I can see:
https://vinuarumugham.substack.com/p/covid-19-severity-is-a-result-of
I do have H1 and H2 blockers but have never had to use them, nor the horse paste I have.
He also published this:
Immunological Mechanisms Explaining the Role of Vaccines, IgE, Mast Cells, Histamine, Elevating Ferritin, IL-6, D-dimer, VEGF Levels in COVID-19 and Dengue, Potential Treatments Such as Mast Cell Stabilizers, Antihistamines: Predictions and Confirmations
https://europepmc.org/article/PPR/PPR241819
https://rumble.com/v1w6kuq-dr.-sucharit-bhakdi-the-path-to-living-hell.html it isn't the Spike (tho it is bad) It is the mRNA technology itself that shuts down the native immune system leading to ADE and thus inability to defend against CANCER CELLS and other infections and which ALSO creates the autoimmune disruption IgG4 etc. And the methodology the thinking is flawed. Yet they will say, are saying the concept of the xperiment (you and your vaxxed cohors) is successful, yayy! Lets go make MORE mRNA tech jabs for Tetnus, for Measles etc etc etc... and mandate them all. Pretty soon, a dead and dying population - and those NOT dying are having brain damage from vascular clotting and become more tractable and biddable... and less intelligent and able to use their higher logic.
Having been flooded with IgG4 news the last couple of days, I was looking forward to your take on it. I haven't had time to read it yet but I already appreciate it.
Rampant Speculation Time. I was thinking about the claims that IVM can help prevent and even break up S-protein reported in this twitter thread: https://twitter.com/GabinJean3/status/1606984534767042560
The question that arose was how does the S-protein get into the circulatory system in large enough quantity such that it can produce such large clots?
Then I wondered about the papers I have seen that demonstrate the less-than-perfect copy fidelity of the mRNA-based #ClotShots and thought about the possibility that some people are creating S proteins with defective trans-membrane anchors and they slip right through when they try to anchor in the cell membrane prior to the virion forming.
Do we know enough about the packaging of SARS-CoV-2 or other viruses to understand how packaging occurs. I very much doubt there is some sort of viral shepherd that shepherds all the constituent parts to the cell membrane for those viruses that use our own cell membranes as their own membranes. Perhaps the S protein has some sort of affinity for the cell membrane and naturally inserts itself into the cell membrane and then the remaining components are attracted to the trans-membrane anchor tails and some other signal causes the virion to pinch off the cell membrane and form.
But if those anchors are defective the S protein will slip into the intracellular space and if the cells happen to be circulatory epithelial cells they get into the blood stream and form clots.
As I said, rampant speculation.
You are forgiven. Take your shoes off and set a spell.
Dr Michael Burry: Leukemia - Look for it in the wake of the vaccine
There is so much noise being made about the IgG4 paper that the CDC, the FDA and all other organs of Government are going to have to do something, like declare that it is anti-Science and witchcraft.
I come from a self employed business background where I am always solving new problems. We often use the synergy of different minds in a group setting to solve problems. Different ideas start building on each other and these individual minds become a "mastermind " where ideas and creativity feed off each other and come up with solutions that one individual could never have come up with on their own. I see similarities in Substack contributors on this topic, feeding off each others ideas and leading to understanding a very complex problem.
For example, in the original article last summer Brian states "Only two time points are shown for this group; my best guess is that “post 2nd” means 14 days, due to the high level of IgG1."
Jessica's article states that "post 2nd" was after 210 days.
https://jessicar.substack.com/p/the-immunological-mechanism-of-action
This 210 days becomes an important part of the puzzle that Igor expands on. IgG4 growth that occurs months after the boost could be the reason for increasing mortality stats appearing months after the booster instead of occurring immediately after the booster. In effect, creating a delay in the deaths as the IgG4 levels have had a chance to build.
https://igorchudov.substack.com/p/booster-caused-immune-tolerance-explains
I know Brian was being facetious about being first, but it really isn't about credit for being first. The sharing of ideas by different creative minds is creating the insight into a very complex problem.
😂😂😂 you and John Paul.
Better late than never. Good to read it again actually. I was trying to explain it to quad-jabbed just a couple days ago. Good refresher.
Super late response, but who will take over Unglossed now?? I think that random guy I found in the back of an Arby's should do well! I think he used to work at Pfizer (that's how the gag works right?).