What is More Pro-Vaccine than claiming vaccine X "doesn't work?"
—?
As a serial defender of Covid vaccine severe efficacy who nonetheless argues that no one should take Covid vaccines, please explain this to me.
If the argument against Covid vaccines is that they do not prevent severe outcomes, how is that argument not pro-vaccine?
Perhaps I'm suffering a senior moment, but I haven't the slightest idea what you wrote even means. Maybe this: The argument against COVID vaccines is that they do not prevent severe outcomes from COVID. It could mean that they have no value if that prevention was the intended result. I'm also lost as to the context. Maybe I missed a post. If this is a continuation of a thread, then I'm sorry.
A quandary.
Perhaps one could object to it not based on (negative)efficacy but on the fact it is a slow-kill (sometimes fast-kill) bioweapon that will soon claim a significant % of ~5B humans?
Vaccines and the associated fields of pseudo-science are more akin to Astrology than actual science.
Lie after lie - for over a century - piled and interlocking, forming the foundations of this Plademonium. The conditioned - and coerced - acceptance of vaccines by Doctors and their victims. The legal armour/misconduct that has prevented any reckoning for the human carnage they have been causing. The military-grade psychological operations that have kept the sick Agenda rolling on.
The only efficiacy of the DeathVaxx* was in waking up many millions of people. Sleeping in our Matrix pods, we needed a shock that could be felt.
But it carried a steep cost. Almost unimaginable.
Peace.
*-And in killing a lot of people. Oh, and in making Billions of USD for the psychopaths.